Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Database Servers
DB2InformixIngresMS SQLOraclePervasive.SQLPostgreSQLProgressSybase
Desktop Databases
FileMakerFoxProMS AccessParadox
General
General DB TopicsDatabase Theory
Related Topics
Java Development.NET DevelopmentVB DevelopmentMore Topics ...

Database Forum / General DB Topics / General DB Topics / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Visual FoxPro 5 on Windows 2000 (faster machine)

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
marshall.hughes@ngc.com - 29 Mar 2005 18:21 GMT
Hello,
I am not a programmer, I only work in a business office, but by
unfortunate incidents have been put in charge of updating/maintaining a
Visual Foxpro database with business information. (really ad hoc and
the person who set it up is long gone) I am currently having to travel
14 miles each way just to access the computer and update the info on
the database. We are in the process of moving the info to our server in
my building, but there is one problem. I am told that Visual Fox pro
doesn't work on machines faster than about 300-600 mhz because of some
"Divide by zero overflow error". I currently use a Pentium 2.5 Ghz
machine with 512 MB of RAM. According to the folks out at the other
office, you cannot run Visual Foxpro on a machine that fast. (The
laptop currently running the app is a 1Ghz machine with 256MB RAM) They
said they already downloaded the patch from Microsoft that was supposed
to address this , but it didn't work. Is there anyone out there who is
currently running Visual Foxpro on a fast machine using Windows 2000?
If so, how were you able to get it going? I am really worried about
this as I would hate to think that we would have to depend solely on a
3.5 yr old laptop that sounds like it is going to die at any moment.
How could Microsoft let a product fail in this way? Thanks in advance.
Leif B. Kristensen - 29 Mar 2005 19:36 GMT
marshall.hughes@ngc.com skrev:

> I am told that Visual Fox
> pro doesn't work on machines faster than about 300-600 mhz because of
> some "Divide by zero overflow error".

You didn't, by any chance, try to run a Google search on the words
"foxpro divide by zero overflow"? Within 0.23 seconds, the answer would
have appeared on your desktop.

The FoxPro versions affected by this bug, were hardly "visual". It was
the old 16-bit FoxPro, up to version 2.6. The problem was finally
solved with version 2.6a, with some interim patch along the way.

> I currently use a Pentium 2.5
> Ghz machine with 512 MB of RAM. According to the folks out at the
> other office, you cannot run Visual Foxpro on a machine that fast.
> (The laptop currently running the app is a 1Ghz machine with 256MB
> RAM) They said they already downloaded the patch from Microsoft that
> was supposed to address this , but it didn't work.

To me, that sounds like gross incompetence.
Signature

Leif Biberg Kristensen
http://solumslekt.org/

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.