marshall.hughes@ngc.com skrev:
> I am told that Visual Fox
> pro doesn't work on machines faster than about 300-600 mhz because of
> some "Divide by zero overflow error".
You didn't, by any chance, try to run a Google search on the words
"foxpro divide by zero overflow"? Within 0.23 seconds, the answer would
have appeared on your desktop.
The FoxPro versions affected by this bug, were hardly "visual". It was
the old 16-bit FoxPro, up to version 2.6. The problem was finally
solved with version 2.6a, with some interim patch along the way.
> I currently use a Pentium 2.5
> Ghz machine with 512 MB of RAM. According to the folks out at the
> other office, you cannot run Visual Foxpro on a machine that fast.
> (The laptop currently running the app is a 1Ghz machine with 256MB
> RAM) They said they already downloaded the patch from Microsoft that
> was supposed to address this , but it didn't work.
To me, that sounds like gross incompetence.

Signature
Leif Biberg Kristensen
http://solumslekt.org/