Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Database Servers
DB2InformixIngresMS SQLOraclePervasive.SQLPostgreSQLProgressSybase
Desktop Databases
FileMakerFoxProMS AccessParadox
General
General DB TopicsDatabase Theory
Related Topics
Java Development.NET DevelopmentVB DevelopmentMore Topics ...

Database Forum / General DB Topics / DB Theory / October 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Entities and relationships

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Tegiri Nenashi - 12 Oct 2007 19:35 GMT
I never really took any effort to bother to know what these are until
they got in my way in otherwise fine paper:
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0710/0710.2083v1.pdf
It defines an entity as a relation (aka table:-) with a single
noncomposite key, and relationship as a table with composite key. Does
this definition pretty much exhausts the entity-relationship theory?
Bob Badour - 12 Oct 2007 20:33 GMT
> I never really took any effort to bother to know what these are until
> they got in my way in otherwise fine paper:
> http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0710/0710.2083v1.pdf
> It defines an entity as a relation (aka table:-) with a single
> noncomposite key, and relationship as a table with composite key. Does
> this definition pretty much exhausts the entity-relationship theory?

Um, no, because an order line item is generally an entity--albeit a weak
one. If I recall correctly.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.