I never really took any effort to bother to know what these are until
they got in my way in otherwise fine paper:
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0710/0710.2083v1.pdf
It defines an entity as a relation (aka table:-) with a single
noncomposite key, and relationship as a table with composite key. Does
this definition pretty much exhausts the entity-relationship theory?
Bob Badour - 12 Oct 2007 20:33 GMT
> I never really took any effort to bother to know what these are until
> they got in my way in otherwise fine paper:
> http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0710/0710.2083v1.pdf
> It defines an entity as a relation (aka table:-) with a single
> noncomposite key, and relationship as a table with composite key. Does
> this definition pretty much exhausts the entity-relationship theory?
Um, no, because an order line item is generally an entity--albeit a weak
one. If I recall correctly.