> Thanks. After more monitoring/debugging I found out that I needed to
> create bufferpool of 1000 pages.
> > Thanks. After more monitoring/debugging I found out that I needed to
> > create bufferpool of 1000 pages.
> >
> NO. A bufferpool of 1000 pages is only 4 MB of memory. This is very small.
But it's obviously probably enough to satisfy the usage requirements of this
frequently-updated table which has it's own bufferpool.
> The total of all your bufferpools on that server should be about 50% of the
> total available memory (allowing some memory for use by other DB2 resources,
> the OS, and other non-DB2 application processes) on that machine.
YMMV. This really depends on how much memory your system has and the amount
of non-database processing you are hosing.
--
Matt Emmerton
Mark A - 17 Jan 2005 21:45 GMT
> But it's obviously probably enough to satisfy the usage requirements of this
> frequently-updated table which has it's own bufferpool.
Obviously? Just how did you come to that conclusion? It is an SMS tablespace
for a table of unspecified number of rows. The row size is quite large.
> YMMV. This really depends on how much memory your system has and the amount
> of non-database processing you are hosing.
That's what I said if you bothered to read my post. I said:
"allowing some memory for use by other DB2 resources, the OS, and other
non-DB2 application processes"
I also said to use about 50% of the available memory, which obviously is
dependent on the amount of memory for the system.