Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Database Servers
DB2InformixIngresMS SQLOraclePervasive.SQLPostgreSQLProgressSybase
Desktop Databases
FileMakerFoxProMS AccessParadox
General
General DB TopicsDatabase Theory
Related Topics
Java Development.NET DevelopmentVB DevelopmentMore Topics ...

Database Forum / DB2 Topics / January 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

containers in the same FS

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jean-Marc Blaise - 11 Jan 2006 21:27 GMT
IBM recommends to place each ts container on a different physical disk.

What about the impacts if all containers (DMS) are in the same FS (supported
by multiple disks) ?

Does DB2 preallocate doing // IO, so we could assume to have, for 2
containers as exemple:

Ext1ct1, Ext1ct2, Ext2ct1, Ext2ct2

or will we get ct1 allocated first, then ct2 ?

Thanks for your help,

JM
Phil Sherman - 12 Jan 2006 16:34 GMT
The general rule is to divide up data evenly between containers. Using
multiple disks allows parallel I/O to the different containers. When you
have multiple containers on a single disk (or set of disks - I assume
RAID) then the potential performance benefit of multiple containers is
lost.

DMS initially allocates the entire container size which will tie up the
entire space no matter how little data is actually stored.

You can now also add additional containers at a later date if your
initial set fills up. Commands also exist to resize DMS containers.

Phil Sherman

> IBM recommends to place each ts container on a different physical disk.
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> JM
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.