But isn't it true that schema is just a logical grouping of data objects?
Why do I then physically need to move the entire data alongwith it?
Cheers,
San.
Mark A - 01 May 2006 06:07 GMT
> But isn't it true that schema is just a logical grouping of data objects?
> Why do I then physically need to move the entire data alongwith it?
>
> Cheers,
> San.
In DB2 you can rename the table name, but not the schema name. Just accept
it and move on with your life.
Bob [IBM] - 01 May 2006 06:12 GMT
> But isn't it true that schema is just a logical grouping of data objects?
> Why do I then physically need to move the entire data alongwith it?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>
Would creating an alias for your two-part name help? Have a look at the
create alias statement.
Serge Rielau - 01 May 2006 12:43 GMT
> But isn't it true that schema is just a logical grouping of data objects?
Correct.
> Why do I then physically need to move the entire data alongwith it?
Rename simply hasn't gotten as much attention as it could have.
No technical reason at all.
Note that in DB2 Viper ALTER TABLE ALTER COLUMN has received a lot of
attention which has been much more common requirement.
Cheers
Serge

Signature
Serge Rielau
DB2 Solutions Development
IBM Toronto Lab
shsandeep - 02 May 2006 02:56 GMT
Viper!!! COME SOON!!
Thanks guys.
Cheers
San.