Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Database Servers
DB2InformixIngresMS SQLOraclePervasive.SQLPostgreSQLProgressSybase
Desktop Databases
FileMakerFoxProMS AccessParadox
General
General DB TopicsDatabase Theory
Related Topics
Java Development.NET DevelopmentVB DevelopmentMore Topics ...

Database Forum / DB2 Topics / May 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Reorgchk Stored Procedure.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
doug - 15 May 2006 22:57 GMT
Ok IBM techs.

Does the REORGCHK_TB_STAT and REORGCHK_IX_STAT Stored Procedures issue
a Runstats.

I have ran the old REORGCHK utility with stats and both SPs and it
appear that the SPs do not run a Runstats.  I get two different
results.  But if I first run a runstats prior to running the SPs I get
the same results.  Can you please confirm this behavior of the SPs.
Kiran Nair - 16 May 2006 05:57 GMT
If you are using version equal to or higher than 8.2.2 (equivalent to
Version 8.1 FixPak 9) you can go for using admin_cmd stored procedure
for issuing runstats command fro mthe stored procedure
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/db2luw/v8/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.db2.
udb.doc/admin/r0012547.htm

the SP REORGCHK_TB_STAT and REORGCHK_IX_STAT suggests if we need to do
runstats but it will not do it.

Regards,
Kiran Nair

> Ok IBM techs.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> results.  But if I first run a runstats prior to running the SPs I get
> the same results.  Can you please confirm this behavior of the SPs.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.