> A recent HD failure and next year's first quarter release of Red Hat's
> EL5 made me decide to temporarily use FC6 on my sandbox system, an IBM
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> C. Copy CD to a HD directory and install
> I expect a future update from RH to the SELinux rules will fix this.
Without a statement to that effect from RH, I don't think I would have the
same expectation.
> 2. UDB 9 Java installation works with supplied Java. UDB 8.1 will not
I'm not sure that this Java will work with RHEL5's SELinux policy.
> install with Java. The Java included with the 8.1 UDB CD doesn't run
> under FC6's 2.6.18-1 kernel. The UDB 8.1 control center will run under
> IBM Java2-150 and Sun Java 160. I've never been able to get UDB to
> install using the DB2USELOCALJRE and JAVA_HOME environment variables
> since, I think, Java 131. (The test program always returns a bad return
> code.)
Have you pursued any PMRs with IBM over that?
> Install (8.1) by:
> A. Use db2_install command. Install FP14 before creating the
> DAS or DB2 instances.
> 3. UDB's libimf.so (common code used by many other programs) crashes
> before it starts running. This will show up first when db2fmcd fails
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Hopefully, IBM will resolve this by supplying an appropriate SELinux
> policy statement with a future fixpak.
[...]
> I hope that IBM does not delay approval of RHEL5 as a recommended
> operating system for UDB.
What would "delay" mean to you? Immediate upon release of RHEL5? Within 30
days? 90 days? More? Note that the SELinux policy for RHEL5 appears to
be different from FC6, and it appears it does take a bit more work to get
DB2 to install on current betas of RHEL5. Of course, IBM will want to test
with the official GA of RHEL5 before claiming any level of support for it,
so there will be "some" delay - not sure how long that will be. Perhaps it
will be within a week or two, or perhaps not until the next fixpack is
released after RHEL5 is shipped (to incorporate fixes/changes).