Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Database Servers
DB2InformixIngresMS SQLOraclePervasive.SQLPostgreSQLProgressSybase
Desktop Databases
FileMakerFoxProMS AccessParadox
General
General DB TopicsDatabase Theory
Related Topics
Java Development.NET DevelopmentVB DevelopmentMore Topics ...

Database Forum / Informix Topics / November 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

DB comes down w/ BUFFERS > 350000 ... UR down to 95%

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Anthony Presley - 30 Nov 2004 05:01 GMT
Hello all,

Our DB has noticeably gotten slower over the past few months [since
Art last gave me a "hey your DB is purring along fine"].  I checked,
and our Read Utilization is down around 95%, which is rather low --
the last check I did it was closer to 99.97%.

In reviewing the newsgroup, it seems that our BUFFERS may need some
tuning, as our DB is now closer in size to 12GB -- rather than 8GB
previously.  We're doing more, so I assume our "working set" is
greater.  Granted, we probably have some I/O issues, we're in the
process of solving, but in the meantime I can't seem to get the
BUFFERS above 350000.

I've set SHMTOT to 0, and SHMADD and SHMVIRTSIZE are 50502.  LOCKS is
700000.  As below:

LOCKS           700000          # Maximum number of locks
BUFFERS         350000          # Maximum number of shared buffers
NUMAIOVPS       20              # Number of IO vps
PHYSBUFF        48              # Physical log buffer size (Kbytes)
LOGBUFF         32              # Logical log buffer size (Kbytes)
LOGSMAX         10              # Maximum number of logical log files
CLEANERS        100             # Number of buffer cleaner processes
SHMBASE         0x10000000L     # Shared memory base address
#SHMVIRTSIZE    16384           # initial virtual shared memory
segment size
SHMVIRTSIZE     50502           # initial virtual shared memory
segment size
SHMADD          50502           # Size of new shared memory segments
(Kbytes)
SHMTOTAL        0               # Total shared memory (Kbytes).
0=>unlimited
CKPTINTVL       400             # Check point interval (in sec)
LRUS            80              # Number of LRU queues
LRU_MAX_DIRTY   30              # LRU percent dirty begin cleaning
limit
LRU_MIN_DIRTY   20              # LRU percent dirty end cleaning limit
#LRU_MAX_DIRTY  5               # LRU percent dirty begin cleaning
limit
#LRU_MIN_DIRTY  1               # LRU percent dirty end cleaning limit
LTXHWM          50              # Long transaction high water mark
percentage
LTXEHWM         60              # Long transaction high water mark
(exclusive)
TXTIMEOUT       300             # Transaction timeout (in sec)
LTXEHWM         60              # Long transaction high water mark
(exclusive)
TXTIMEOUT       300             # Transaction timeout (in sec)
STACKSIZE       32              # Stack size (Kbytes)

This is a dual athlon 1900 box, running 7.31.UD2, and RH7.3.  We've
got 3.5GB of RAM on the machine.  I've setup the shmmax and shmall to
be ~640MB, or 671088640.  This doesn't help much.  Anytime I try and
go over 350,000 BUFFER's, it quits immediately with:

23:29:09  Exception Recursion while handling: MT_EX_OS, Context: mem
23:29:09  PANIC: Attempting to bring system down
23:29:09  mt_shm_remove: WARNING: may not have removed all/correct
segments

Any ideas why?
Guy Bowerman - 30 Nov 2004 07:27 GMT
Hello,

This looks like bug 161674
"LINUX 32-BIT SERVER SILENTLY DIES DURING INITIALIZATION IF 'BUFFERS'
ARE 260000 OR MORE. MAY BE RELATED TO '__PAGE_OFFSET' IN LINUX KERNEL"

Fixed in 7.31.UD7.

Regards
Guy

> Hello all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 58 lines]
>
> Any ideas why?
Neil Truby - 30 Nov 2004 09:10 GMT
<lots of diagnostics>

OS and IDS version?
Anthony Presley - 30 Nov 2004 16:27 GMT
> <lots of diagnostics>
>
> OS and IDS version?

As mentioned above:

This is a dual athlon 1900 box, running 7.31.UD2, and RH7.3.  We've
got 3.5GB of RAM on the machine.

--Anthony
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.