Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Database Servers
DB2InformixIngresMS SQLOraclePervasive.SQLPostgreSQLProgressSybase
Desktop Databases
FileMakerFoxProMS AccessParadox
General
General DB TopicsDatabase Theory
Related Topics
Java Development.NET DevelopmentVB DevelopmentMore Topics ...

Database Forum / Informix Topics / October 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

PDQ on a single processor system

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jörg RÃ1/4schenschmidt - 28 Oct 2006 09:19 GMT
Hi,

can sombody tell me if I can benefit from PDQ on single processor system ?

According Informix performance guide, multiple treads are started when
when PDQ is used, but can i benefit from this wif one physical processor
is available only ? I am afraid the extra work to manage the multiple
threads will be bad for the overall Informix performance on a single
processor system ?

Is it better to set PDQ_MAXPRIORITY to 0 in case a single processor
system is used ?

Any experience ?

Regards ...

Joerg
Neil Truby - 28 Oct 2006 10:06 GMT
Possibly it depends upon your hardware.  Multi-cored and multi-threaded
processors possibly would benefit from multiple cpu vps, but wih an elderly,
single-core, single processor your concern that you may lose more on the
swings of conext switching than you gain on the roundabouts of Informix
parallel processing may well be founded.

Signature

Neil Truby                       t:01932 724027
Director                         m:07798 811708
Ardenta Limited              e:neil.truby@ardenta.com

> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Joerg
scottishpoet - 28 Oct 2006 10:53 GMT
I think if you have multiple disks then more then the disks can be
accessed in parallel rather than serially. Its then a balance point of
how busy  the ready Q becomes to process the data returned from the
disks 2 disks may be OK, 10 may swamp the the ready Q

> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Joerg
Andreas Legner - 28 Oct 2006 22:50 GMT
Don't underestimate the memory restrictions when not using PDQ_PRIORITY.

Still when using version 10.00 or later 9.40s, DS_NONPDQ_QUERY_MEM can also help out here.

Regards,
Andreas
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.