Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Database Servers
DB2InformixIngresMS SQLOraclePervasive.SQLPostgreSQLProgressSybase
Desktop Databases
FileMakerFoxProMS AccessParadox
General
General DB TopicsDatabase Theory
Related Topics
Java Development.NET DevelopmentVB DevelopmentMore Topics ...

Database Forum / Informix Topics / August 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

oncheck -cD errors

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Thomas J. Girsch - 27 Aug 2007 04:36 GMT
All:

I'm seeing bazillions of these errors on some tables when I run oncheck -cD:

WARNING: data page 0xe495 in tablespace 0x4f00002 appears to be

         more or less full than is indicated in the bitmap.

         Bitmap mode: 0xc, Calculated mode: 0x4.

WARNING: The bitmap mode for page 0xe495 has been reset from 0xc to 0x4.

Anything to worry about?

Thanks,

- TJG
Art S. Kagel - 27 Aug 2007 16:57 GMT
On Aug 26, 11:36 pm, "Thomas J. Girsch" <tgir...@NOSPAM.gmail.com>
wrote:
> All:
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> - TJG

Not a real problem.  The oncheck repaired the damage.  Could be that a
crash or non-standard shutdown in the past caused modified bitmap
pages to not be flushed to disk.

Art S. Kagel
Thomas J. Girsch - 28 Aug 2007 05:19 GMT
> Not a real problem.  The oncheck repaired the damage.  Could be that a
> crash or non-standard shutdown in the past caused modified bitmap
> pages to not be flushed to disk.
>
> Art S. Kagel

I can't imagine that would be it.  It occurred for nearly every record
in a table with millions of rows.  But I've heard other reports that
it's nothing to worry about unless it persists.

Thanks,

- TJG
bozon - 28 Aug 2007 16:28 GMT
On Aug 28, 12:20 am, "Thomas J. Girsch" <tgir...@NOSPAM.gmail.com>
wrote:

> > Not a real problem.  The oncheck repaired the damage.  Could be that a
> > crash or non-standard shutdown in the past caused modified bitmap
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> - TJG

You don't have 2 instances sharing the same space do you? Otherwise I
agree with what you have heard.
Art S. Kagel - 28 Aug 2007 17:18 GMT
On Aug 28, 12:20 am, "Thomas J. Girsch" <tgir...@NOSPAM.gmail.com>
wrote:

> > Not a real problem.  The oncheck repaired the damage.  Could be that a
> > crash or non-standard shutdown in the past caused modified bitmap
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> in a table with millions of rows.  But I've heard other reports that
> it's nothing to worry about unless it persists.

But each bitmap page describes over 4000 pages and depending on
pagesize and rowsize a single bitmap page can affect more than
10million rows!

Art S. Kagel
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.