Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Database Servers
DB2InformixIngresMS SQLOraclePervasive.SQLPostgreSQLProgressSybase
Desktop Databases
FileMakerFoxProMS AccessParadox
General
General DB TopicsDatabase Theory
Related Topics
Java Development.NET DevelopmentVB DevelopmentMore Topics ...

Database Forum / Informix Topics / June 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

FYI: IM Consumability Survey

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Serge Rielau - 26 Jun 2008 20:06 GMT
Your opportunity to "stick it to the man" :-)
http://www.ibm.com/software/data/info/consumability-survey/

Cheers
Serge
Signature

Serge Rielau
DB2 Solutions Development
IBM Toronto Lab

Captain Pedantic - 26 Jun 2008 20:46 GMT
> Your opportunity to "stick it to the man" :-)
> http://www.ibm.com/software/data/info/consumability-survey/

"Consumability"?  What are these arseholes doing to my beautiful language?
Obnoxio The Clown - 26 Jun 2008 20:47 GMT
>  
>> Your opportunity to "stick it to the man" :-)
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> "Consumability"?  What are these arseholes doing to my beautiful language?
>  
Productionising it into something more performant.
Captain Pedantic - 26 Jun 2008 20:55 GMT
> Your opportunity to "stick it to the man" :-)
> http://www.ibm.com/software/data/info/consumability-survey/
>
> Cheers
> Serge

I got as far as the bit that asked "What business problem are you trying to
solve", and gave up.
IBM is obsessed with "Business Problems" I am trying to solve.
Or, at least, the people who write surveys and partner evaluation forms are.

Sometimes you just want to achieve better throughput, or easier
administration, or just use new functionality.
Is this solving "business problems"?
I suppose if you wear brightly-coloured framed spectacles, snort a lot of
coke and write surveys for IBM, it is.

For many of us it's just "using new functionality".

I'm afraid I gave up on the survey at this point in order to avoid the
inevitable welter of sh.t.
Serge Rielau - 26 Jun 2008 21:24 GMT
>> Your opportunity to "stick it to the man" :-)
>> http://www.ibm.com/software/data/info/consumability-survey/
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> I'm afraid I gave up on the survey at this point in order to avoid the
> inevitable welter of sh.t.
I knew I could count on utter refusal of cooperation from those with the
loudest voices. :-)

If you make it to the end I think there is a box where you could
complain about that too....

Cheers
Serge
Signature

Serge Rielau
DB2 Solutions Development
IBM Toronto Lab

Obnoxio The Clown - 26 Jun 2008 21:28 GMT
Serge Rielau said:

> If you make it to the end I think there is a box where you could
> complain about that too....

Yeah, funny that.

Signature

Bye now,
Obnoxio

"There were a myriad of problems which conspired to corrupt your reason
and rob you of your common sense. Fear got the best of you, and in your
panic you turned to the Labour Party. They promised you order, they
promised you peace, and all they demanded in return was your silent,
obedient consent."

Captain Pedantic - 26 Jun 2008 21:52 GMT
>>> Your opportunity to "stick it to the man" :-)
>>> http://www.ibm.com/software/data/info/consumability-survey/
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> I knew I could count on utter refusal of cooperation from those with the
> loudest voices. :-)

I didn't *utterly* refuse.
I had a go but got frustrated.
Obnoxio The Clown - 26 Jun 2008 22:19 GMT
Captain Pedantic said:
>>>> Your opportunity to "stick it to the man" :-)
>>>> http://www.ibm.com/software/data/info/consumability-survey/
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> I didn't *utterly* refuse.
> I had a go but got frustrated.

I got about six pages in before I lost the will to live. I got the
distinct impression that they weren't expecting anyone to actually finish
it.

Signature

Bye now,
Obnoxio

"There were a myriad of problems which conspired to corrupt your reason
and rob you of your common sense. Fear got the best of you, and in your
panic you turned to the Labour Party. They promised you order, they
promised you peace, and all they demanded in return was your silent,
obedient consent."

david@smooth1.co.uk - 26 Jun 2008 23:43 GMT
> Captain Pedantic said:
>
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

"Your input has been accepted", well I bitched about the level of
support for ISM lets see what happens..
Ian Michael Gumby - 27 Jun 2008 15:59 GMT
> From: theharlequin36@hotmail.com
> Subject: Re: IM Consumability Survey
> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:55:08 +0100
> To: informix-list@iiug.org

> I got as far as the bit that asked "What business problem are you trying to
> solve", and gave up.
> IBM is obsessed with "Business Problems" I am trying to solve.
> Or, at least, the people who write surveys and partner evaluation forms are.

I should explain why IBM has this "fixation" on "solving problems".

IBM is very good at drilling in their sales training. They use a "solution selling methodology".

IBM trains their sales force to try and understand the customer's pain. Once they know the pain, then they can address it with a solution. This is the core of their solution selling methodology.

So to translate IBM speak, this survey is trying to understand which of your buttons they can press to help push more kit.

For example... Suppose you're in retail and you want to be more than just "PCI compliant". Your pain is that you need to ensure that your customer's credit card details are not going to be exposed within your database. So IBM's solution would be to offer encryption within the database, along with some form of auditing.

By answering the survey, you're helping IBM to build a use case along with some form of demonstrating customer demand for a specific feature.

Does that help to put things in perspective?

-G

_________________________________________________________________
The i’m Talkathon starts 6/24/08.  For now, give amongst yourselves.
http://www.imtalkathon.com?source=TXT_EML_WLH_LearnMore_GiveAmongst
Kevin Cherkauer - 27 Jun 2008 18:28 GMT
> So to translate IBM speak, this survey is trying to understand which of your buttons
   > they can press to help push more kit.

It's really not that cynical. They are trying to understand which areas of
the product produce a painful user experience so this information can be
used to decide what areas to prioritize in future engineering work. Of
course the end goal is to sell more product, but the means to that end is
actually to make the product better in areas that are causing customer pain.
So it is supposed to be win-win: we make the product serve your needs
better, which leads you to perhaps buy more of it *because* it is serving
your needs better -- not because someone tricked you into it.

Information from prior consumability surveys was used to help choose some of
the new features and areas to be reworked in Cheetah and Cheetah 2.

When we don't get enough input from actual customers, we have to guess. We
try to make the guesses as educated as possible through a formal internal
consumability "survey" process, where a cross-section of people with
knowledge of a given product (e.g. product management, QA, information
development (what we call the tech writers), engineering, tech support,
etc.) form a team to attempt to estimate the consumability on numerous
different dimensions. I participated in one of these efforts for IDS a year
or two ago. We do our best, but the product would benefit even more if real
live customers and users like you took the survey, especially if you attempt
to make constructive criticisms (not just why some area is bad, but also
suggestions for how it could be improved). :-)

Signature

Kevin Cherkauer
Software Engineer
IBM Informix Dynamic Server -- Database Kernel

> From: theharlequin36@hotmail.com
> Subject: Re: IM Consumability Survey
> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:55:08 +0100
> To: informix-list@iiug.org

> I got as far as the bit that asked "What business problem are you trying
> to
> solve", and gave up.
> IBM is obsessed with "Business Problems" I am trying to solve.
> Or, at least, the people who write surveys and partner evaluation forms
> are.

I should explain why IBM has this "fixation" on "solving problems".

IBM is very good at drilling in their sales training. They use a "solution
selling methodology".

IBM trains their sales force to try and understand the customer's pain. Once
they know the pain, then they can address it with a solution. This is the
core of their solution selling methodology.

So to translate IBM speak, this survey is trying to understand which of your
buttons they can press to help push more kit.

For example... Suppose you're in retail and you want to be more than just
"PCI compliant". Your pain is that you need to ensure that your customer's
credit card details are not going to be exposed within your database. So
IBM's solution would be to offer encryption within the database, along with
some form of auditing.

By answering the survey, you're helping IBM to build a use case along with
some form of demonstrating customer demand for a specific feature.

Does that help to put things in perspective?

-G

The i’m Talkathon starts 6/24/08.  For now, give amongst yourselves. Learn
More
Neil Truby - 27 Jun 2008 22:48 GMT
>    > So to translate IBM speak, this survey is trying to understand which
> of your buttons
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> the product produce a painful user experience so this information can be
> used to decide what areas to prioritize in future engineering work.

I'm happy to accept that the motives are not cynical.  But why do these IBM
surveys and Tech Support communications have to be couched in Birtesque
management newspeak and jargon?  Why do we have always to be solving
"business problems"?  Technical issues often have a very indirect
relationship to the "business problem", so why not let us talk about the
technical issue?

I suspect that the answer is that the parts of IBM that develop these
surveys are dominated by marketing people and business school graduates who
wouldn't know one end of a computer from another.

When I place a support call I often have to describe the "business impact"
of the problem so that IBM can assess if they can be arsed to fix it or not.
"I've paid a million bucks for this stuff and  want it to f.cking work"
doesn't seem to be a valid response for some reason that truly eludes me.
Neil Truby - 27 Jun 2008 22:54 GMT
> When I place a support call I often have to describe the "business impact"
> of the problem so that IBM can assess if they can be arsed to fix it or
> not. "I've paid a million bucks for this stuff and  want it to ... work"
> doesn't seem to be a valid response for some reason that truly eludes me.

Oops, hadn't quite finished that point before posting it.
Obviously IBM has finite resources and has to priorotise the things it's
going to fix.  But being required to describe "Business Impact" just
encourages creative writing, assuming you want your problem looked at .
Technical impact and the viability of any workarounds would be much more
appropriate.  Wouldn't it?
Serge Rielau - 30 Jun 2008 00:26 GMT
So much energy in this group :-)

Few points:
* I personally know one of the guys who helped prep the survey.
  Matter of fact he was presenting it internally
  (and some of the result so far as they pertain to DB2) when I posted
  here.
  So.. Yeah what does Gumby know? ;-)
* There is this movement prised above all at IBM right now which is
  called outside-in-design and the not-so-technical folks get
  sometimes carried away by attempt to root anything in a business
  problem. Such is life.
  It can get rather amusing to fit an "outer join" into a task solving a
  business problem. But most times reason prevails...
* Ultimately however it does matter whether you encounter a problem
  more likely because you are:
  a) An ISV trying to sell a CRM system
  b) CISCO trying to deploy a router
  c) Who knows what.
  As it so happens certain technical patterns are more likely to be
  encountered in certain "business" scenarios. So mining this
  correlation can be valuable.

I took the liberty of sending some of the feedback
(censored to fit a PG rating) back to said person who gave the presentation.

Cheers
Serge
Signature

Serge Rielau
DB2 Solutions Development
IBM Toronto Lab

Ian Michael Gumby - 30 Jun 2008 00:43 GMT
> From: srielau@ca.ibm.com
> Subject: Re: IM Consumability Survey
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>    here.
>    So.. Yeah what does Gumby know? ;-)

Gumby knows a hell of a lot Serge.
I don't think IBM would really like it if I posted *all* the dirt and skeleton's that I know. ;-)

Knowing one of the guys who did this survey doesn't say much. From the comments I've heard, the survey is too long, and a bit of a disaster.
But then again, I've had to fill out those darn CMP surveys once a quarter or so to keep getting my free mags, so I guess IBM isn't the only ones who don't know how to do a survey. ;-)

> * There is this movement prised above all at IBM right now which is
>    called outside-in-design and the not-so-technical folks get
>    sometimes carried away by attempt to root anything in a business
>    problem. Such is life.

Now Serge, its those "not so technical" issues that sell kit.
The decision maker for the most part is a "non-technical" person. (CIOs these days are not technical).
In today's company, the IT department is no longer hidden in the back room. In some companies, if the IT depr isn't responsive, they'll just buy a suped up PC and put up a linux server with MySQL and solve their problem on their own. (Or even ick Microsoft...)

Look, I don't think anyone is against the concept of the survey. Just the actual survey kinda blows.

_________________________________________________________________
Earn cashback on your purchases with Live Search - the search that pays you back!
http://search.live.com/cashback/?&pkw=form=MIJAAF/publ=HMTGL/crea=earncashback
Madison Pruet - 30 Jun 2008 03:32 GMT
> So much energy in this group :-)

I took the survey -- not to affect the results, but to try to figure out
what all of the complaints were about.   It took a total of 5 minutes to
complete.  I just don't understand what all of the negative complaints
are all about.  The questions seemed to be fairly reasonable to me.

The way I see it, we (i.e. IBM) can try to get input from the customers
or we can avoid any attempt to get input from the customers.  Don't know
for sure, but I think that it makes more sense to try to get input from
the customers than not.

> I took the liberty of sending some of the feedback
> (censored to fit a PG rating) back to said person who gave the
> presentation.
>
> Cheers
> Serge
Captain Pedantic - 30 Jun 2008 09:06 GMT
>> So much energy in this group :-)
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>> Cheers
>> Serge

As Gumby said,  "Look, I don't think anyone is against the concept of the
survey.  Just the actual survey kinda blows".  Whatever that means.
Ian Michael Gumby - 30 Jun 2008 13:02 GMT
> From: theharlequin36@hotmail.com

> As Gumby said,  "Look, I don't think anyone is against the concept of the
> survey.  Just the actual survey kinda blows".  Whatever that means.

I'll break it down for you...

C for concept.

F for design.
F for implementation.

Now, you may ask why a C for concept. Simple. A survey isn't anything new or exciting. Its a standard idea on getting customer feedback.

Somebody needs to send the "marketing team" a bottle of tequila (not the cheap stuff), a couple of limes, kosher salt, and a tone of nachos and salsa.
Then have Jerry K. lock them in a room with a ream of note pads and don't let them out until the come up with some good ideas.

Why T'Kill-ya? Cause clearly beer and pizza don't work on marketing types and if you gave them vodka, they'd think it was a reward. ;-)

_________________________________________________________________
Earn cashback on your purchases with Live Search - the search that pays you back!
http://search.live.com/cashback/?&pkw=form=MIJAAF/publ=HMTGL/crea=earncashback
Captain Pedantic - 30 Jun 2008 13:27 GMT
>>Ian Michael Gumby" <im_gumby@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:mailman.1295.1214827411.20610.informix-list@iiug.org...

> From: theharlequin36@hotmail.com

> As Gumby said, "Look, I don't think anyone is against the concept of the
> survey. Just the actual survey kinda blows". Whatever that means.

> I'll break it down for you... <long monologue about marketing types
> follows>

Mmm, more trivially, I just wasn't sure what "blows" meant in that context.
I assume it's not a term of approbation ...
Ian Michael Gumby - 28 Jun 2008 00:13 GMT
On Jun 27, 12:28 pm, "Kevin Cherkauer" <invalid_addr...@nowhere.com>
wrote:
>     > So to translate IBM speak, this survey is trying to understand which
> of your buttons
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Software Engineer
> IBM Informix Dynamic Server -- Database Kernel

[SNIP]

I really hate it when you don't bother to read the post when you
respond to it... ;-)

First, you're in the "lab" and I think if you were given the
opportunity to take IBM's Solution Selling Methodology, you should do
so.

Its probably the best training you'll ever get out of IBM.
If its one thing that IBM does well is understand the selling process.

Again, when IBM asks a customer about their "pain" its to understand
the business issues that they need help with.

There was no cynicism in my post.

IBM is like every other business out there. They want to sell more
product to make more money. Its called commerce or capitalism. ;-)

But hey!
What do I know? Its not like I spent 4 1/2 years cross matrix'd to SSD
or anything like that. Naw, I don't have a copy of the SSM course book
sitting on *my* bookshelf, now do I? ;-)

-G
Kevin Cherkauer - 28 Jun 2008 00:53 GMT
You think you know the one and only thing IBM uses these surveys for. You
are incorrect, because I personally know of a second use, which is the one I
described in my posting, because I personally participated on the internal
team that filled in the internal consumability "survey" for the Cheetah
release (11.10). The questions in the matrix we filled in were pretty much
the same ones listed on the web site survey. The leader of this team also
was involved in the same exercise done earlier for the 10.00 release, and he
said they used the results of the 10.00 survey to choose many of the
features that were put into 11.10, and named specific ones.

You could be correct that the survey is also used for other purposes. But
you are incorrect in stating that the sole purpose is the one you have
claimed.

Signature

Kevin Cherkauer
Software Engineer
IBM Informix Dynamic Server -- Database Kernel

<Snip>

> Again, when IBM asks a customer about their "pain" its to understand
> the business issues that they need help with.
Ian Michael Gumby - 29 Jun 2008 17:47 GMT
> From: invalid_address@nowhere.com
> Subject: Re: IM Consumability Survey
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> you are incorrect in stating that the sole purpose is the one you have
> claimed.

Sigh.

I suggest you go back and re-read this entire thread.

The point I was addressing was what IBM means when they ask about a customer's pain.
That is IBM's SSM speak. Don't believe me, ask your manager to send you to SSM training.

When I give a short answer, you rush in to "defend" IBM for something that doesn't need to be defended.

IBM is a company that is like any other company. They want to sell more product.

If you don't believe me, then I suggest you sit down over drinks and discuss this with S. Miller.

But hey! What do I know? ;-)
I'm just trying to save the world from drivers who trust their GPS Nav systems and drive in to ponds and other water features.
Or in OTC's case, trying to find the closest pub. ;-)

-G

_________________________________________________________________
The other season of giving begins 6/24/08. Check out the i’m Talkathon.
http://www.imtalkathon.com?source=TXT_EML_WLH_SeasonOfGiving
Kevin Cherkauer - 30 Jun 2008 17:28 GMT
> "Ian Michael Gumby" <im_gumby@hotmail.com> wrote in message
 > So to translate IBM speak, this survey is trying to understand which of
your buttons
 > they can press to help push more kit.

This is the phrase that sounded cynical to me and is what triggered my first
reply. Perhaps we could take a survey to see if others also think it sounds
cynical. :-)

But I shall reiterate that the survey does not only ask about customer pain
to help the sales force "push" people's "buttons." It also asks so that
engineering can work to remove the sources of pain. Answers toward the "high
pain" side of the spectrum do help generate decisions to fund IDS
development projects and features that directly address those pain points.

BTW it's not called "SSM" anymore.
Signature

Kevin Cherkauer
Software Engineer
IBM Informix Dynamic Server -- Database Kernel

I suggest you go back and re-read this entire thread.

The point I was addressing was what IBM means when they ask about a
customer's pain.
That is IBM's SSM speak. Don't believe me, ask your manager to send you to
SSM training.

When I give a short answer, you rush in to "defend" IBM for something that
doesn't need to be defended.
Ian Michael Gumby - 30 Jun 2008 19:27 GMT
> From: invalid_address@nowhere.com
> Subject: Re: IM Consumability Survey
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> reply. Perhaps we could take a survey to see if others also think it sounds
> cynical. :-)

Cynical?
Dude you really need to put down the micro brew and step outside and smell the fresh air.
We live in a capitalistic economy driven life. You dont' produce, you're made redundant.
So the more kit being sold, the more likely we'll keep you on the payroll rather than place your job in Mumbai...

> But I shall reiterate that the survey does not only ask about customer pain
> to help the sales force "push" people's "buttons." It also asks so that
> engineering can work to remove the sources of pain. Answers toward the "high
> pain" side of the spectrum do help generate decisions to fund IDS
> development projects and features that directly address those pain points.

Again, the Pain is what are the business drivers that must be resolved.

> BTW it's not called "SSM" anymore.
Really?
So what have they started to call it these days?
SSM is well known by legions of IBM sales critters.

_________________________________________________________________
Need to know now? Get instant answers with Windows Live Messenger.
http://www.windowslive.com/messenger/connect_your_way.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Ref
resh_messenger_062008

InDeep - 29 Jun 2008 01:42 GMT
What customers are actually using Informix besides the handful like Walmart and
Sears?

It seems kind of silly to ask for information from people when you really haven't
done the marketing to justify a survey.  You can't be serious with 10 customers
can you?

If I were you I'd focus on marketing what you have rather than trying to improve
something hardly anyone is using.

>     > So to translate IBM speak, this survey is trying to understand which
> of your buttons
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> to make constructive criticisms (not just why some area is bad, but also
> suggestions for how it could be improved). :-)
Indeep is a f.cking idiot - 29 Jun 2008 10:14 GMT
>What customers are actually using Informix besides the handful like Walmart and
>Sears?

why do you have to show repeatedly that you are the biggest
f.cking idiot in this group.

If only handful were using informix, then we would not have seen any
new versions to informix, much less a version like 11.50 which has
far more features than previous many versions of Informix. You mean
IBM is clueless to invest in a product used by only Walmart and Sears.
InDeep - 29 Jun 2008 19:05 GMT
>> What customers are actually using Informix besides the handful like Walmart and
>> Sears?
>
> why do you have to show repeatedly that you are the biggest
> f.cking idiot in this group.

Why do you think that you are right?

> If only handful were using informix, then we would not have seen any
> new versions to informix, much less a version like 11.50 which has
> far more features than previous many versions of Informix. You mean
> IBM is clueless to invest in a product used by only Walmart and Sears.

I'm not sure that the incremental improvements in Informix are good
enough to sell to the market.  I've yet to hear about anything from outside the
c.d.i community or the IIUG.  I believe IBM put money into the product to
retain its existing base, but in the larger picture _outside_ the Informix
community there is absolutely zero buzz or street cred.   I've heard more
about Postrges / Green Plum in the last year than anything coming from IBM.

The improvements that I _have_ heard about speak to the existing customer
base, and in the case of Walmart, they alone generate enough revenue to
pay for improvements.  So the thinking that IBM are pouring a lot of money
into Informix is bogus, because nobody has ever even talked about a broader
base of consumers other than the top few repeated here.  There is no marketing
program, nothing to get developers excited about.  The full enterprise edition
is time-bombed, as if anyone were actually going to use it in a production
context, much less without paying for the license.  Nobody has heard of Informix
so that whole argument is bogus.

So, I know I get under your skin, as well as a lot of the other IDS sychophants,
but try to see outside the IBM/Informix box, and think about a world without
Informix.  _That_ is the world I live in, still waiting for the dolts at IBM to
see opportunity instead of the status quo.  Still waiting for Informix to be
marketed like it should be.  I could run circles around the people marketing
Informix, and get a developer program going.  But that is as likely as IBM
actually having a marketing program for IDS.

-ID-
david@smooth1.co.uk - 29 Jun 2008 11:55 GMT
> What customers are actually using Informix besides the handful like Walmart and
> Sears?
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Verizon moved to Informix last year.
http://www-01.ibm.com/software/success/cssdb.nsf/CS/LWIS-73GLVL?OpenDocument&Sit
e=dmmain&cty=en_us


Cisco have started using it inside WAN Manger
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/net_mgmt/cisco_wan_manager/11.0.00/database_inte
rface/guide/backup.html

http://www.informix-zone.com/node/263
http://www.informix-zone.com/files/presentations/dreamjob_balsbough_cisco.pdf

In Fact ...
"Cisco’s requirements inspired many of the enhancements in the IDS 11
(formerly code-named “Cheetah”) release"

So why would Cisco put IDS inside their products if it is "something
hardly anyone is using"?
Ian Michael Gumby - 29 Jun 2008 18:24 GMT
> From: david@smooth1.co.uk
> Subject: Re: IM Consumability Survey
> Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 03:55:09 -0700
> To: informix-list@iiug.org

First, there are only a few very large customers like a Wal*Mart, K-Sears, etc...

I could give you a list of large customers, however, I don't think IBM would like me talking about them. ;-)

> Verizon moved to Informix last year.
> http://www-01.ibm.com/software/success/cssdb.nsf/CS/LWIS-73GLVL?OpenDocument&Sit
e=dmmain&cty=en_us

Verizon has been a long time customer of Informix.
And they were/are large enough to warrant an on site Regency... er Premiere Services Engineer.

> Cisco have started using it inside WAN Manger
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/net_mgmt/cisco_wan_manager/11.0.00/database_inte
rface/guide/backup.html

> http://www.informix-zone.com/node/263
> http://www.informix-zone.com/files/presentations/dreamjob_balsbough_cisco.pdf

Yes, and so too does Moto imbed IDS. Unfortunately, the future for Moto isn't so bright ...

Oh there are a lot of IDS customers out there and there are some former Informix customers that I could name too.

Moto, Siemens, Cisco, etc ... all OEM IDS.
Verizon,Wal*Mart, Home Depot, K-Sears all use IDS internally.

Two different groups of "customers".

And to InDeep's point,  these lists of customers are mainly un-named. There are a lot of companies using IDS, but no one knows this. IDS aka Informix, is the IT Industry's dirty little sekret. Unfortunately the one area that IBM sucks is in viral marketing.

But hey!
Why fix something that even while broken, is still out selling DB2 on LUW aka distributed platforms? ;-)
Its not the product which is broke, but the marketing and sales effort of IBM that is broke.

On a side note... While IBM's IDS management team tries to get the word out internally, just briefing the sales force isn't enough. You have to give the sales force incentives to sell the product. Did you ever wonder why the sales force pushed so hard to convert IDS customers to DB2 right after the acquisition? Simple really. The sales rep was comp'd on net new licenses. A conversion from IDS to DB2 counted as a net new license. And of course, the Informix customer was now an existing IBM customer so you had lower barriers to entry. ;-)

But hey! What do I know?
Its not like I spent 5 years in the belly of the beast cross matrix'd to S&D... Oh wait. I was. :-(

-G

_________________________________________________________________
The other season of giving begins 6/24/08. Check out the i’m Talkathon.
http://www.imtalkathon.com?source=TXT_EML_WLH_SeasonOfGiving
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.