> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Christian Schmidt.
I'm a little confused here. I'm not sure what "atomar" is, or means. But
...
1. Yes, critical to external backups is that all the disks "will be [split]
at the same time". "Consistency Group" is the word for this.
2. *Why* do you wish to avoid blocking the database? It's easy to script
sync->block->split->unblock. Even on a database of terabytes the time
between block and unblock can be a second or two at most ...
3. In your suggestion above how would you ensure that there is no i/o
between the end of your checkpoint and the end of the disk split process,
*except* with a blocking checkpoint??
Kevin Cherkauer - 02 Jul 2008 19:58 GMT
"Neil Truby" <neil.truby@ardenta.com> wrote in message
> I'm a little confused here. I'm not sure what "atomar" is, or means.
I would guess from the context that he means "atomic" and this is just a
minor English-is-not-his-native-language mistake. I know a lot of modern
storage boxes support atomic mirror splitting.

Signature
Kevin Cherkauer
Software Engineer
IBM Informix Dynamic Server -- Database Kernel