Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Database Servers
DB2InformixIngresMS SQLOraclePervasive.SQLPostgreSQLProgressSybase
Desktop Databases
FileMakerFoxProMS AccessParadox
General
General DB TopicsDatabase Theory
Related Topics
Java Development.NET DevelopmentVB DevelopmentMore Topics ...

Database Forum / Ingres Topics / March 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

CREATE INDEX parallel vs CREATE INDEX in sequence

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
jpzuate@gmail.com - 21 Mar 2007 10:03 GMT
Hi all,

I have a table with 6 382 316 tuples and 7 indexes, 2 K pages. Table
is Heap.
Ingres version is II 9.0.4 (a64.lnx/105)NPTL on RedHat.

To rebuild indexes, I try two method :
- "old school" : CREATE INDEX in sequence
- "new style" : CREATE INDEX with parallel syntax

Result :
- CREATE INDEX in sequence : 17 min 18 sec
- CREATE INDEX parallel : 1 h 6 min 57 sec

It is the first time I test this technique with a large amount of data
and previous tests (with max 1 000 000 tuples) did not show a so large
difference. Parallel syntax is supposed faster, better, and so on.

For information, partitionning the same table with 2 dimentions and 42
partitions take only 4 min 30 sec ...

Do we miss something in the configuration or something else ? Who have
experience to share ?

Thank in advance,
Jean-Pierre
jpzuate@gmail.com - 21 Mar 2007 11:03 GMT
> Result :
> - CREATE INDEX in sequence : 17 min 18 sec
> - CREATE INDEX parallel : 1 h 6 min 57 sec

Test of this morning show 19min for CREATE INDEX with parallel syntax

JPz
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.