Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Database Servers
DB2InformixIngresMS SQLOraclePervasive.SQLPostgreSQLProgressSybase
Desktop Databases
FileMakerFoxProMS AccessParadox
General
General DB TopicsDatabase Theory
Related Topics
Java Development.NET DevelopmentVB DevelopmentMore Topics ...

Database Forum / Ingres Topics / October 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

comparing db job markets

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
michaelnewport@yahoo.com - 20 Oct 2007 14:22 GMT
On 25 Nov 2006, 23:46, "michaelnewp...@yahoo.com"
<michaelnewp...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Michael Leo wrote:
> > Gang,
> > It is, after all Friday.  I'm waiting for Michael Newport to
> > point out how there are more jobs for MySQL than Ingres
> > on the job boards.
>
> fromwww.jobserve.com, contract/perm, last 7 days
>
> sql server     8659
> oracle          3945
> access        1201
> sybase        1045
> progress        924
> db2               346
> mysql            297
> informix           91
> postgres          42
> adabas            22
> ingres              15
> rdb                    5
>
> did I pass the test :?)
>
> =====================================================
> take 2
> fromwww.jobserve.com, contract/perm, last 7 days
>
> oracle       3343 - down 600
> sql server  2528 - the original figure seems suspect, perhaps I forgot
> the " 's
> access       979 - down 200
> progress     920 - same
> sybase       641 - down 400
> mysql         384 - up 100
> db2             296 - down 50
> informix        52 - down 40
> adabas         25 - same
> ingres          16 - same
> postgres      11 - down 30
> rdb                5 - same
>
> same time next year :)

=====================================================
take 3
from www.jobserve.com, contract/perm, last 7 days

oracle          3202
"sql server"   3191
sybase          672
mysql            484
db2               320
informix           55
postgresql       28
ingres             23
adabas           18
rdb                   3

forget access and progress, too many ambiguous uses.

Mysql job vacancies continue to rise and Ingres stays the same.
Paul Mason - 20 Oct 2007 14:44 GMT
> On 25 Nov 2006, 23:46, "michaelnewp...@yahoo.com"
> <michaelnewp...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 59 lines]
>
> Mysql job vacancies continue to rise and Ingres stays the same.

Since when is 23 the same as 16? That's a 43% rise compared to a 26%
rise in Mysql. Of course it would be much nicer if Ingres was starting
from a higher base.

Signature

Paul Mason

michaelnewport@yahoo.com - 20 Oct 2007 15:29 GMT
> michaelnewp...@yahoo.com <michaelnewp...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On 25 Nov 2006, 23:46, "michaelnewp...@yahoo.com"
[quoted text clipped - 67 lines]
> --
> Paul Mason

perhaps you should have started from the top...
i.e. 15 is the same as 16

I couldn't be bothered to comment on each figure this time (23).
But I did comment on Mysql vs Ingres for Mike Leo ;-)
On Web - 20 Oct 2007 21:59 GMT
>> michaelnewp...@yahoo.com <michaelnewp...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > On 25 Nov 2006, 23:46, "michaelnewp...@yahoo.com"
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>> >> > point out how there are more jobs for MySQL than Ingres
>> >> > on the job boards.

I just find it surreal that anyone cares about how ingres relates to mySQL
when it's pretty clear that in comparison with other databases nobody wants
ingres developers.

In my experience demand for mySQL development is usually lumped in with some
other technology and I suspect it's asked for more than those figures may
show, though I may be wrong.

I think that the figures are really showing what a niche product ingres has
sadly become.

Before long we'll be encountering people asking about our painting
abilities..
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.