Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Database Servers
DB2InformixIngresMS SQLOraclePervasive.SQLPostgreSQLProgressSybase
Desktop Databases
FileMakerFoxProMS AccessParadox
General
General DB TopicsDatabase Theory
Related Topics
Java Development.NET DevelopmentVB DevelopmentMore Topics ...

Database Forum / Ingres Topics / December 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Ingres Database 9.2 released (yes, 9.2--it's a long story...)

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Roy Hann - 18 Nov 2008 16:18 GMT
Better get over to www.ingres.com and download a copy.  Looks like it
has lots of good stuff in it.  

Some of my favorites are:

- better default configuration
- incremental rollforward (to a standby database)
- cached dynamic cursor query plans
- IPM and iimonitor now display cursor definitions (yay!!)

My only teansy-weansy quibble is that it is now offically called Ingres
Database 9.2.  It ain't a database.  It's a DBMS.  Big difference.   Oh
well, it's a small price to pay for getting rid of that (literally)
retarded year designation from the name, I guess.  

If you want to know how come it's 9.2, Emma has blogged about it.

Signature

Roy

UK Ingres User Association Conference 2009 will be on Tuesday June 9, 2009
Go to http://www.iua.org.uk/join to get on the mailing list.

Mark R. Winston - 19 Nov 2008 14:23 GMT
[snip]
> My only teansy-weansy quibble is that it is now offically called Ingres
> Database 9.2.  It ain't a database.  It's a DBMS.  Big difference.   Oh
> well, it's a small price to pay for getting rid of that (literally)
> retarded year designation from the name, I guess.  

Yeah, that's an unfortunate misuse of the term "database" applied to the
DBMS that's all too common.  I can concede "laptop" vs. "notebook"
computer, but I can't swallow "database" where it should be DBMS.  I
work in an environment that utilizes Microsoft SQL Server and they've
devolved to not just referring to a DBMS as a "database", but some think
that all "database" are "SQL Server", or just "SQL".  Maddening.

Of course, it could be worse.  They could've named it "INGRES Party
Favour 9.2", since "Icebreaker" was already taken.

***
Mark R. Winston
***
steve11228@gmail.com - 20 Nov 2008 04:53 GMT
On Nov 19, 7:23 am, "Mark R. Winston" <winsto...@datavailable.com>
wrote:

> [snip]
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> devolved to not just referring to a DBMS as a "database", but some think
> that all "database" are "SQL Server", or just "SQL".  Maddening.

But MS still refers to sql server as a RDBMS instead of DBMS. As if
anyone there knows what the R part is:)

www.beyondsql.blogspot.com
Roy Hann - 20 Nov 2008 09:14 GMT
> On Nov 19, 7:23 am, "Mark R. Winston" <winsto...@datavailable.com>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> But MS still refers to sql server as a RDBMS instead of DBMS. As if
> anyone there knows what the R part is:)

The R is bogus anyway.  Nobody--least of all MS--sells an RDBMS; they're
all SQL DBMSs.  Again, a big difference.

But while we're on this pedantic streak, I have noticed in the last few
years that end-users (or at least their managers) use the term
"database" when they mean "application".  This is actually quite
important because a couple of times when doing bids and proposals we've
realized too late that we've been talking at cross-purposes with the
customer.

Personally I'd be glad to see the word "database" completely abolished.

Signature

Roy

UK Ingres User Association Conference 2009 will be on Tuesday June 9, 2009
Go to http://www.iua.org.uk/join to get on the mailing list.

steve - 21 Nov 2008 01:48 GMT
> The R is bogus anyway.  Nobody--least of all MS--sells an RDBMS; they're
> all SQL DBMSs.  Again, a big difference.

> But while we're on this pedantic streak, ...

You may be on to something here. The relational community does write
with a pedantic slant. After all, if you're trying to describe the
science of data it's hardly surprising. But I fear they overlook the
idea that those in their target audience are not yet scientists. To
keep their interest perhaps a more creative and entertaining style is
warranted without compromising the key concepts. I thus describe some
of my own work:) Recently while talking to some net folks about
Dataphor I referred to it as a RAD tool, R(elational) A(ccelerator) D
(evelopment). As opposed to sql (Sql Server) which is a R(apid) D(e-
acceleration) D(evelopment) tool. (This was well received:) Somewhat
sophomoric but entertaining. Perhaps you have to give users something
other than relvars to hang their tables on:)

> Personally I'd be glad to see the word "database" completely abolished.

I tend towards this too. Just shorten it to "data". Maybe there is no
basis, nor utility in the rest of it:)

best,
steve dassin

Blogging about smashing data with Dataphor
www.beyondsql.blogspot.com
thiagomz - 08 Dec 2008 18:22 GMT
> Better get over to www.ingres.com and download a copy.  Looks like it
> has lots of good stuff in it.  
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> If you want to know how come it's 9.2, Emma has blogged about it.

Just for Solaris ? When linux x86_64 comes out ?

Signature

Regards,

Thiago Zerbinato
Oracle/Ingres DBA
Ribeirao Preto/SP
Brazil

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.