| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Working with NOR gates | 30 Oct 2004 22:16 GMT | 2 |
This topic is a spin off from Marshall's comment that he would like a language with <OR> built into it, but he shies away from <NOT>. It's far enough off topic so that I wanted to start a new topic. Some of you may be familiar with the idea that it's possible to generate all
|
| Semantics and Hierarchies | 30 Oct 2004 20:43 GMT | 6 |
A topic that I havnt seen addressed adequately is how to model concepts such as subclasses and categories (according to the Elmasri 1985 terminology) from an EER model to the physical model of a database. The guidelines available (even from highly recommended books) are useful ...
|
| Call for an API standard for SQL statements | 30 Oct 2004 02:33 GMT | 67 |
It does not seem to exists any standard for how to define SQL statements in a object oriented API. Currently different products have completely different syntax. Until such standard exists, people can always argue that it safer to type SQL statements directly as strings
|
| Advice needed: Create a junction table, or a better way? | 29 Oct 2004 21:54 GMT | 1 |
Hi Gang, I'm looking for some advice. I have a table called Estimate that contains information about an estimate given.
|
| SQL 89 or 92? | 28 Oct 2004 19:45 GMT | 1 |
In Access Options, this can be set. I wonder if there are any good reasons why someone should not use the latest ANSI standard of 92, considering they develop a brand new database where no old SQL code exists. Konstantinos
|
| Building the matadata diff engine (more skunk works) | 28 Oct 2004 16:36 GMT | 4 |
On two of the contracts I worked, one of the things I was called upon to work with was a pair of databases that had diverged, because different DDL had been applied to the two. I approached the first one by moderating a series of meetings between the
|
| Arbitrary Constraints | 27 Oct 2004 16:54 GMT | 24 |
Last week I mentioned that I believed unique and referential constraints are not used to their full potential, and that they could be used instead of some of the constraints we see today. Several kind souls argued the other side of this and helped me to solidify my thoughts. ...
|
| Naming convention for dependencies and contingencies? | 26 Oct 2004 23:38 GMT | 2 |
Hi Gang, Let's say you have a database that stores entries (example only) for construction materials. You have a table with all your materials and any dependencies.
|
| Microsoft Decision Trees algorithm - question | 25 Oct 2004 19:45 GMT | 2 |
Good morning, Can anyone describe me the theory of Decision Trees algorithm which is used MS SQL 2000 Analysis Services ? Thanks,
|
| The fable of DEMETRIUS, CONSTRAINTICUS, and AUTOMATICUS | 25 Oct 2004 12:09 GMT | 99 |
Recently archeologists have uncovered a document which they believe is a previously undiscovered Platonic dialogue. Such a discovery would be a priceless boon to modern philosophy, if true, but some computer scientists believe it may also have applications to that field as well. ...
|
| Building the Meta-data Diff Engine | 24 Oct 2004 15:29 GMT | 7 |
What follows in more skunk works. You have been warned! On two of the contracts I worked, one of the things I was called upon to work with was a pair of databases that had diverged, because different DDL had been applied to the two.
|
| Upgrade as Change in Meta-state | 22 Oct 2004 16:55 GMT | 10 |
Here is something I do not see discussed often, or else I have missed it. Is there much interest in discussing the upgrade operation on an RDB? Compare an upgrade to everyday use. In everyday production use, a database is going through a series of serializable changes to state, ...
|
| XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly | 21 Oct 2004 22:46 GMT | 157 |
In one of the other discussions, XML was listed as one of the bad things perpetrated by the object oriented people. And I've seen a lot of discussion in here about using XML instead of a DBMS. I've never had the opportunity to get up close and personal with XML. I
|
| Primary vs. Surrogate! What a nightmare debate. | 20 Oct 2004 14:01 GMT | 15 |
I must be reading all day on the issue and I am more confused then when I started. I started my db's with natural keys as I initially was exposed to the theory of relational db's and wasn't just assigned the task of building something
|
| On view updating | 19 Oct 2004 10:17 GMT | 92 |
What do you think about this? http://www.dbdebunk.com/page/page/1396086.htm I can't agree more with this: ---
|