Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Database Servers
DB2InformixIngresMS SQLOraclePervasive.SQLPostgreSQLProgressSybase
Desktop Databases
FileMakerFoxProMS AccessParadox
General
General DB TopicsDatabase Theory
Related Topics
Java Development.NET DevelopmentVB DevelopmentMore Topics ...

Database Forum / General DB Topics / DB Theory / October 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
Working with NOR gates30 Oct 2004 22:16 GMT2
This topic is a spin off from Marshall's comment that he would like a
language with <OR> built into it, but he shies away from <NOT>.  It's far
enough off topic so that I wanted to start a new topic.
Some of you may be familiar with the idea that it's possible to generate all
Semantics and Hierarchies30 Oct 2004 20:43 GMT6
A topic that I havnt seen addressed adequately is how to model concepts such
as subclasses and categories (according to the Elmasri 1985 terminology)
from an EER model to the physical model of a database. The guidelines
available (even from highly recommended books) are useful ...
Call for an API standard for SQL statements30 Oct 2004 02:33 GMT67
It does not seem to exists any standard for how to define SQL
statements in a object oriented API. Currently different products have
completely different syntax. Until such standard exists, people can
always argue that it safer to type SQL statements directly as strings
Advice needed: Create a junction table, or a better way?29 Oct 2004 21:54 GMT1
Hi Gang,
I'm looking for some advice.
I have a table called Estimate that contains information about an estimate
given.
SQL 89 or 92?28 Oct 2004 19:45 GMT1
In Access Options, this can be set. I wonder if there are any good reasons
why someone should not use the latest ANSI standard of 92, considering they
develop a brand new database where no old SQL code exists.
Konstantinos
Building the matadata diff engine (more skunk works)28 Oct 2004 16:36 GMT4
On two of the contracts I worked,  one of the things I was called upon to
work with was a pair of databases that had diverged, because different DDL
had been applied to the two.
I approached the first one by moderating a series of meetings between the
Arbitrary Constraints27 Oct 2004 16:54 GMT24
Last week I mentioned that I believed unique and referential constraints are
not used to their full potential, and that they could be used instead of
some of the constraints we see today.  Several kind souls argued the other
side of this and helped me to solidify my thoughts.  ...
Naming convention for dependencies and contingencies?26 Oct 2004 23:38 GMT2
Hi Gang,
Let's say you have a database that stores entries (example only) for
construction materials.
You have a table with all your materials and any dependencies.
Microsoft Decision Trees algorithm - question25 Oct 2004 19:45 GMT2
Good morning,
Can anyone describe me the theory of Decision Trees algorithm which is used
MS SQL 2000  Analysis Services ?
Thanks,
The fable of DEMETRIUS, CONSTRAINTICUS, and AUTOMATICUS25 Oct 2004 12:09 GMT99
Recently archeologists have uncovered a document which they believe is a
previously undiscovered Platonic dialogue.  Such a discovery would be a
priceless boon to modern philosophy, if true, but some computer scientists
believe it may also have applications to that field as well.  ...
Building the Meta-data Diff Engine24 Oct 2004 15:29 GMT7
What follows in more skunk works.  You have been warned!
On two of the contracts I worked,  one of the things I was called upon to
work with was a pair of databases that had diverged, because different DDL
had been applied to the two.
Upgrade as Change in Meta-state22 Oct 2004 16:55 GMT10
Here is something I do not see discussed often, or else I have missed it.
Is there much interest in discussing the upgrade operation on an RDB?
Compare an upgrade to everyday use.  In everyday production use, a database
is going through a series of serializable changes to state, ...
XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly21 Oct 2004 22:46 GMT157
In one of the other discussions,  XML was listed as one of the bad things
perpetrated by the object oriented people.  And I've seen a lot of
discussion in here about using XML instead of a DBMS.
I've never had the opportunity to get up close and personal with XML.  I
Primary vs. Surrogate! What a nightmare debate.20 Oct 2004 14:01 GMT15
I must be reading all day on the issue and I am more confused then when I
started.
I started my db's with natural keys as I initially was exposed to the theory
of relational db's and wasn't just assigned the task of building something
On view updating19 Oct 2004 10:17 GMT92
What do you think about this?
http://www.dbdebunk.com/page/page/1396086.htm
I can't agree more with this:
---
Pages: 1 2 3 4 September, 2004
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.