Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Database Servers
DB2InformixIngresMS SQLOraclePervasive.SQLPostgreSQLProgressSybase
Desktop Databases
FileMakerFoxProMS AccessParadox
General
General DB TopicsDatabase Theory
Related Topics
Java Development.NET DevelopmentVB DevelopmentMore Topics ...

Database Forum / General DB Topics / DB Theory / June 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
Database design question28 Jun 2006 12:34 GMT27
I have a database design questions. How can we specify one of two
columns in a table should be not null? In other words, if one column is
null then another column should not be null. Here is an example. Let's
say we have document and we need to specify permissions to the
definitions for conceptual, logical, physical26 Jun 2006 11:06 GMT5
We use these terms a lot: conceptual, logical, physical.
I believe I have a good intuitive understanding of these
terms and how they are used. However, an intuitive
understanding and a formal definition are not the same
linear syntax?23 Jun 2006 06:45 GMT3
The wikipedia article on Codd's Twelve Rules (looks like a Baker's Dozen
 to me, maybe one is allowed to ignore any single one of them!) says:
Rule 5: The comprehensive data sublanguage rule:
 The system must support at least one relational language that
ANSI Join improvement23 Jun 2006 03:30 GMT8
At the risk of being labeled a crank...
I'm looking for someone to tell me whether my idea for improving the
ANSI Join syntax has any merit.  One thing about the current syntax
that often strikes me is I usually join tables on identically named
terminology22 Jun 2006 07:18 GMT30
There's a lot of terminological discussion floating around right now,
and some of it is really bad.
Most basically, a relation is a subset of a product of sets.
In the c.d.t. context, we mean a little more than that, because
Business model tied to relational world21 Jun 2006 20:25 GMT1
http://news.yahoo.com/s/pcworld/20060621/tc_pcworld/126195
It looks like MySpace gathered a lot of data of some value. (What kind
business doesn't -- duh!) Therefore, price it properly and sell it. A
user want to query some data -- then provide an an interface to query
Note to Tony D21 Jun 2006 20:11 GMT4
Tony,
If you think you somehow help others by continuing a discussion with a
retard, we have news for you.
It is severely detrimental to the c.d.t newsgroup quality and hurting
To Bob Badour, sorry21 Jun 2006 20:07 GMT101
I was mad and I called him names. My problem is that I try to hold the
relational model in my head, and it's get hard once you beyond the simple
stuff. So Bob, sorry.
Rich
Fraud Number Null:21 Jun 2006 09:33 GMT1
: "I state that BB is wrong in saying RAM SQL tables representations are
multidimensional..."
BB replies: The SQL table is multidimensional--or more correctly has a
number of dimensions equal to its degree--no matter the medium in which
On Cimode21 Jun 2006 08:01 GMT17
Cimode,
You do not really give a damn about your judeo christian
heritage I respect it though ... I bet if we were face to
face you would have checked the thread about RAM memory
RDMBS samples20 Jun 2006 21:55 GMT37
Can you give me some samples of RDMBS? Like FoxPro, Access
Thanks in advance ;)
BB
Help with SQL query.... I'm sure there is a way!20 Jun 2006 10:23 GMT1
I'm helping a friend to build a system to handle advertisments from
local dealers in different regions/cities. In this system, an
advertisment belongs to a region and is connected to one or more
categories (in this context called searchwords).
Any difference between SQL-DBMS & RDBMS ?19 Jun 2006 21:24 GMT7
what's difference between sql-dbms and rdbms ?
would you show me the theory model about the two dbms or any famous books
about it ?
thanks!
Foreign key problem19 Jun 2006 14:19 GMT54
I am working on an application which need a data model that reflects
the schema structure. My tables are ("*" indicates primary key column):
tableinfo(*table_name)
columninfo(*table_name, *col_name)
Fraud Number 4 Kenneth Downs19 Jun 2006 10:44 GMT2
This one is too easy...I will propose it for debunkning quote of the
week...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BEGIN
Pages: 1 2 3 May, 2006
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.