| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| completeness of the relational lattice | 30 Jun 2007 11:34 GMT | 65 |
Hello Vadim, Marshall and others, The discussion seems to warrant it's own thread, so here goes. There seems to be some disagreement on what algebra we are studying. So let's discuss this first. It is important this get's fixed, because
|
| How would a relational operating system look like? | 28 Jun 2007 21:13 GMT | 14 |
Lately, I came to put a version of Microsoft Vista on my desktop. As I am accustomed to with Microsoft OS's, I am bracing for the impact of how much extra RAM will be consumed when adopting a new generation of OS to make it function prperly. For Vista, I found out it is a
|
| Implement my own in-memory database | 28 Jun 2007 02:46 GMT | 4 |
I'm a programmer with 10 years experience experience and I'm about to (try to) implement my own in-memory database. I have worked with databases on Solaris for the past 4 years or so. I want to implement my own in-memory database. However, I lack
|
| Little design mistakes that can easily be avoided (1): Concatenated keys and addition of columns | 24 Jun 2007 20:01 GMT | 76 |
One of the most frequent misconception I face when working is about how concatenation became a synonym for addition of attributes. Lately, I have had the following example in a board... COL1 COL2
|
| TRUE and FALSE values in the relational lattice | 22 Jun 2007 13:10 GMT | 26 |
Given a relation R(x,y) with domains x={0,1,2}, y={'a','b'} we know from classic predicate theory that the expression R(x=0, y='a') evaluates to true or false. Here is how we establish this siumple fact
|
| Relational symmetric difference is well defined | 20 Jun 2007 13:26 GMT | 45 |
Symmetric difference identity (A \ B) \/ (B \ A) = (A \/ B) \ (B /\ A) holds in relational lattice.
|
| constraints in algebra instead of calculus | 19 Jun 2007 15:59 GMT | 70 |
Okay, a while back we were talking about writing constraints in a language with aspects of the relational calculus, specifically the existential and universal quantifiers. The point was made that that's unnecessary; the calculus is no more expressive
|
| Hierarchical query | 16 Jun 2007 20:00 GMT | 30 |
Reposting with more clarification (as Jan asked). Suppose I have a BNFgrammar and a source text parsed into a tree. How would I query an identifier declaration?
|
| design question - lots of columns.... | 15 Jun 2007 19:36 GMT | 4 |
Wanted to get this groups opinion on my issue. I started a thread @ microsoft.public.sqlserver.server ......... Can you all take a look & offer any advice? http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/browse_thread/t hread/46126ff8c5af502c/f3cdb66023ee17ac
|
| Book recall | 14 Jun 2007 02:06 GMT | 7 |
Copies of my book "Analytics & OLAP in SQL" have pages 13-44 missing and pages 61-92 printed twice. Please contact Morgan-Kaufmann or your book dealer for replacements. I cannot do anything (Remember the movie THE PRODUCERS? "Don't kill us [the producers]!! Kill the
|
| constraints and primary keys | 13 Jun 2007 00:05 GMT | 13 |
I am interested in informed feedback on the use of Constraints, Primary Keys and Unique. The following SQL statement creates a Bands tables for a database of bookings Bands into Venues, where the rule of the business is that only band
|
| HCL hiring IT professionals -Chennai/Noida/Gurgaon/Bangalore | 05 Jun 2007 20:24 GMT | 1 |
HCL hiring IT professionals -Chennai/Noida/Gurgaon/Bangalore Helpdesk / Technical Helpdesk - Noida / Chennai [Call center background preferred] Application Packagers [WISE / Marimba] - Noida
|
| Newbie question on table design. | 04 Jun 2007 10:27 GMT | 57 |
I have a table T with -- let's say -- a million+ records. The application allows logical deletion of a small fraction of these records. (Un-deletion of deleted records is allowed if you have admin privs via a Priveleges table.)
|
| "No one does ER Modelling any more" <-- Is this claim true? | 01 Jun 2007 19:27 GMT | 3 |
There was a discussion on OOAD/UML at my workplace and the this was the facilitator's comments. It was difficult to digest but this is what was said/done: We have a business application to develop. We read the problem
|
| Complement in Relational Lattice | 01 Jun 2007 17:30 GMT | 8 |
RL complement is well-defined. It is roughly the complement of the rows and the complement of the columns. 1. !A has all the columns that aren't in A In other words:
|