| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| implementing a database log | 29 Apr 2008 17:31 GMT | 23 |
i'm the author of a simple open-source database engine. i'm currently adding recovery/logging, and i have some practical questions about the implementation. I have 3 options.
|
| Avoiding an inline view using DML only | 24 Apr 2008 14:01 GMT | 3 |
A user enters a date range (ie. 2 dates, '2008-04-01' and '2008-04-03'), the problem is to determine how many open events exist on each day in this interval. Assume that the "events" table has a "start_date" and an "end_date".
|
| Identifying candidate keys and primary keys | 20 Apr 2008 02:45 GMT | 10 |
Hello guys, this one is for one of my assignments. I want explanations and hints only. I'm still confused with the concepts of candidate keys and primary key. We have a patient medication form from an hospital with these:
|
| Hash Join | 16 Apr 2008 23:13 GMT | 3 |
am doing a project on hash join. implementation to be done on hasNext and getNext interface. hash join has 2 phases. partitioning phase and probing phase. but i dont understand where the partition will be done. in hasNext or
|
| How does one model behavior? | 11 Apr 2008 04:15 GMT | 13 |
How does one model behavior? It would seem to me that, since conveying behavior from one object to another rests on messages, and since messages are made of data, that one needs a data model for the messaging system before one begins to come up
|
| beginner in ER.. | 07 Apr 2008 14:21 GMT | 1 |
beginner in ER.. Need more practical works and scenarios please help. Thanks
|
| How is Behavior Specified | 06 Apr 2008 18:34 GMT | 6 |
How is behavior specified? In particular, is the specification expressed as declaratives or as imperatives?
|
| Terminology Question: Intention and Extension | 05 Apr 2008 23:56 GMT | 5 |
In the early days of the relational model, the words *intention* and "extension* were used respectively to mean *query* and *response*. That is, an SQL (or other database language) query represented your *intention*, that which defined what you wanted to retrieve. What the
|
| CODASYL-like databases | 05 Apr 2008 01:32 GMT | 20 |
RDBMSes are sometimes described as a reaction against network-/ hierarchical databases. I believe that I've read that CODASYL-like DBMSes resulted in databases which were very hard to maintain. Does someone know of more concrete descriptions of what problems the old
|
| Object-relational impedence | 03 Apr 2008 06:06 GMT | 437 |
On Mar 3, 2:07 pm, Thomas Gagne <tga...@wide-open-west.com> wrote:
> All attempts by applications to access a DB's tables and columns > directly violates design principles that guard against close-coupling. > This is a basic design tenet for OO. Violating it when jumping from OO |
| Test Post | 02 Apr 2008 23:58 GMT | 1 |
My ISP just changed USENET service providers. I have seen no new posts since for this newsgroup. If you see no replies to this message, please post one so I know that I can send to and receive from.
|
| Distributed Transactions | 01 Apr 2008 02:27 GMT | 1 |
I am new to the field so I apologize if this question seems trivial. I am currently working on distributed software transactional memory (STM). Since database transactions are the semantic inspiration for STM, I was wondering about the level of concurrency of distributed database ...
|