| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Simple database design question | 31 Oct 2008 21:21 GMT | 17 |
I have 2 tables, "sims" (as in mobile phone sim cards) and "phones" (as in mobile phones). I can add any number of sim cards to the "sims" table and any number of mobile phones to the "phones" table. Simple enough. Rule 1: A sim card can either be in a phone, or not in a phone. ...
|
| Must we also create separate tables? | 31 Oct 2008 21:06 GMT | 10 |
My book claims that for table to be in 1NF, we must: * Eliminate remove repeating groups of data * Create separate tables for each group of related data and identify each row with a unique column ( the primary key )
|
| ?? Functional Dependency Question ?? | 28 Oct 2008 05:27 GMT | 38 |
I'm reading Elmasri & Navathe's "Fundamentals of Database Systems, 4th ed.". The authors discuss how, given a set if FDs, additional FDs can be inferred. The authors provide six "Inference Rules". At one point the authors say this:
|
| Need to activate a database? | 26 Oct 2008 22:58 GMT | - |
With DB2, you need to run "ACTIVATE DATABASE dbname" if you want a database to remain active even when the last session disconnects. This can make a big difference in order to cut down on connection setup times. Does Informix have the same kind of mechanism/requirement, or is a
|
| Article claims the following table is not in 1NF | 23 Oct 2008 23:23 GMT | 6 |
1) One site claims the following table is not in first normal form – but the definition for 1NF just says that data shouldn’t contain repeating groups of fields. And it’s quite obvious that there are no repeating columns in the following table, since I wouldn’t consider
|
| Automatic Normalisation | 23 Oct 2008 14:25 GMT | 2 |
The rules governing whether a given relvar coupled with dependency rules are in a normal form are well defined. Unfortunately, many of the FDs are actually business rules in the designer's head, not easily expressed in the form FD A -> B etc. The
|
| RDBMS vs Map/Reduce | 18 Oct 2008 04:40 GMT | 1 |
I was thinking about it, and it seems like a large amount of operations on an RDBMS are equivalent to map/reduce operations. Does anyone know of any research in this area, or is this old news that I'm just now finding?
|
| Replication in databases | 17 Oct 2008 14:15 GMT | 10 |
I have a fundamental doubt regarding replication in databases. If the isolation level is set to Serializable, why cant we just ship the transaction statements from the master to the backup and replay those transactions. Why do we adopt complicated solutions like log
|
| Modeling Order Extensions | 17 Oct 2008 13:57 GMT | 2 |
I have a leasing system where customers rent items and pay them of over time. This is somewhat different from the usual order/order_line design since in this case the customer only have one order which is then modified via extensions (i.e. as he extends the leasing periods,
|
| A good database monitoring program? | 17 Oct 2008 07:41 GMT | 2 |
First of all I can be said new at database stuff. I want to know how to test MySQL and PostgresSQL. I had googled some and I am thinking of using a monitoring tool. Any monitoring tool with graph reports like jmeter?
|
| Proper multi-users design | 16 Oct 2008 12:35 GMT | 3 |
I've inherited a single user application using a database (multiple backends : Postgres, Firebird, Oracle) and need to bring it on par for multi-users access. Right now each DB operation (fetch a structure, update a record, ...) is
|
| A mysterious (but seemingly genuine) opportunity | 15 Oct 2008 05:58 GMT | 3 |
I just got this email today, from a well-placed acquaintance, passing on an opportunity that greatly exceeds my ability to execute. If anyone reading this meagre outline feels they might have the right background, I'd be happy to pass on your email address.
|