| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| DB2,UDF,modifies sql data | 20 Jan 2005 12:55 GMT | 4 |
when specifying modifies sql data option ... getting following error.. SQL0104N An unexpected token "MODIFIES SQL DATA" was found following "".
|
| create trigger -> invalidates stored procedure | 20 Jan 2005 00:54 GMT | 2 |
V7.1/390 logically, the answer should be NO. the question: does the act of creating a trigger on a table invalidate a SP which doesn't reference the table? or, more generally, at what level does a
|
| Problems with scheduled tasks (SQL22283N) | 19 Jan 2005 16:00 GMT | 1 |
everytime I try to create a new scheduled task, I get the following message: SQL22283N Task "12"."0" does not exist in the Tools Catalog Database. The scheduler cannot retrieve the task from the Tools Catalog Database. The task might have been removed from the Tools Catalog Database ...
|
| Client for DB2 UDB 07.02.0007 database | 19 Jan 2005 15:21 GMT | 7 |
I'm needing to connect to this DB2 database from Oracle, and when I try to connect, I get a message saying I'm using a UDB 8 client against a UDB 07.02.0007 database. I've searched IBM's website for a while looking for a version 7 client, and haven't found one. I'm also confused ...
|
| Is there a rule for determining number of Page Cleaners? | 19 Jan 2005 00:58 GMT | 7 |
I have six hard drives (4 SCSI and 2 EIDE) on my main machine with parts of a database on each drive. The main index is on one SCSI drive all to itself. The main data are on the other three SCSI drives. Small relations are on one EIDE drive, and the logfiles are on the other EIDE ...
|
| SQL0471N - SYSPROC.DSNUTILS | 18 Jan 2005 12:42 GMT | 1 |
I have just upgraded to DB2 V7 for OS/390. However, I get a message everytime when I try to connect from Control Center but everything works fine. [IBM][CLI Driver][DB2] SQL0471N Invocation of routine "SYSPROC .DSNUTILS " failed due to reason "00E7900C". SQLSTATE=55023
|
| Large table redesign | 18 Jan 2005 12:17 GMT | 1 |
We are logging approx. 3 million records every day into a history table. Last week we ran into the 64 GB limit in UDB 8 so we recreated the table with 8 k pagesize to get some breathingroom before we hit the
|
| Bufferpool reduces performance. | 17 Jan 2005 21:46 GMT | 5 |
Folks, I am not sure what I am doing wrong, but We have an transaction that does some serious calculation on small chink of data over and over again.
|
| Windows | 17 Jan 2005 20:54 GMT | 1 |
I would be very thankful if anyone woul be able to tell me where I can find information about the number of Windows users. Thank You
|
| db2look spools DDL in the ascending order of DB objects Timestamp only | 17 Jan 2005 17:53 GMT | 6 |
I have been seing a weird problem with db2look tool in db2 8.2 on Windows 2000 platform. When i spool the DDL using db2look, it spools the DDL in the ascending order of database objects Timestamp and not in the
|
| SQL0204N | 17 Jan 2005 15:32 GMT | 1 |
I am try to create a store procedure in DB2 version 8.1 Personal Edition. I new also new to DB2. I am getting the following error: [IBM][CLI Driver][DB2/NT] SQL0204N "MYDB.MYOPTIONS" is an undefined name. LINE NUMBER=8. SQLSTATE=42704
|
| Multiple Tablespaces | 17 Jan 2005 13:15 GMT | 1 |
I have a question about tablespaces.... Does having Multiple tablespaces (ie..one for indexes, one for large tables and one for smaller tables) realy help out performance considering my containers are all on the same disks?
|
| db2 block archtiecture | 17 Jan 2005 08:42 GMT | 4 |
Where can i find information about db2 block structure? I want to know how it stores rows into blocks , how it handles issues such as row migration / chaining or etc. Kind Regards,
|
| updating a lob | 17 Jan 2005 07:58 GMT | 7 |
First time posting -if this is not the correct forum, please let me know. For updating a LOB in Oracle (using JDBC), you need to lock the row. Is it true in DB2? How Are LOBs implemented in DB2 - Do you have a locator
|
| db2 conf. on HP UX problem | 17 Jan 2005 06:09 GMT | 2 |
HP UX 11i, db2 v8.2 kernel parameters of HPUX such as shmmax had been changed to MEM*0.9, about 3.6g. when I create a partitioned db(4 partitions)on the server, warning raised
|