| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| About Error 1829 ! | 01 Apr 2005 00:00 GMT | 5 |
Who could tell me about the error 1829!
The ESQL/C return the Error -1829.
I don't know how to do with the matter!
Help!
|
| Informix Performance Issues | 31 Mar 2005 23:55 GMT | 15 |
All,
I am using 9.30 on HP-UX 11i. The select queries take quite a long tpo
return. The queries are taking index paths and statistics are also updated.
When I tried to look in to the I/O activity, I could find that kio is
|
| Upgrade from IDS 7.23 to IDS 9.4 using ASP code and IIS causes DB update error | 31 Mar 2005 16:52 GMT | 2 |
I am currently running Microsoft IIS 5.1 (using asp pages w/VB script)
and IDS 9.4 with IBM Informix Connect 2.81. I have been trying to figure
out why I'm getting an error "ADODB.Connection (0x800A0CB3) Current
provider does not support transactions" while trying to do an update ...
|
| Do I need to be RESIDENT | 31 Mar 2005 09:23 GMT | 4 |
We currently have RESIDENT set to -1, if I increase BUFFERS above 2M I get
the message
07:55:17 Informix Dynamic Server Stopped.
07:56:49 mt_shm_init: can't create resident segment
|
| Re: one Performance question AIX 4.3, informix 7.31ud4 | 31 Mar 2005 08:59 GMT | 1 |
REBELLO, Rulesh Felix said:
> we have a 2 CPU, 1GB mem, informix 7.31ud4, AIX 4.3 machine hosting 3
> production databases with following sizes
> db1 - 58 GB |
| disabling indexing and contraints on informix 5.04.uc1 | 30 Mar 2005 19:41 GMT | 3 |
Trying the following SQL syntax on Informix 5.04.UC1 (running on Sol8
x86) but it is not working
echo "SET INDEXES, CONSTRAINTS FOR TABLENAME DISABLED" |dbaccess
DATABASE
|
| Another Permissions question | 30 Mar 2005 15:39 GMT | 4 |
So I've been experimenting to try and understand Informix permissions.
Looking at the sysuser table, there are 3 entries. One of those three is
"public". Is "public" a special user? Do users that connect to
Informix but don't exist in the sysuser table get the "public"
|
| is IDS 9.20 compatible with Solaris 10 | 30 Mar 2005 15:13 GMT | 5 |
I'm planing to upgrade our OS from Solaris 5.7 to 10. However I do not
know how IDS 9.0 will be affected with this upgrade.
Any one has moved to Solaris 10 with Informix Dynamic Server 9.2.?
What problems I my encounter? any patches?
|
| 9.4 upgrade SHMVIRTSIZE problem | 30 Mar 2005 14:58 GMT | 1 |
Upgrade from 9.21 to 9.40
Windows NT Advanced server SP3
4 Gig ram
Had had SHMVIRTSIZE set to 655360
|
| Upgrade question to which the answer is probably RTFM but I can't be arsed | 30 Mar 2005 08:37 GMT | 5 |
Can I upgrade directly from IDS 9.20 to 9.40 latest?
thanks
Neil
|
| Re: Upgrade question to which the answer is probably RTFM but I | 29 Mar 2005 23:41 GMT | 1 |
Neil Truby said:
> Can I upgrade directly from IDS 9.20 to 9.40 latest? RTFM!
|
| Informix MaxConnect | 29 Mar 2005 16:35 GMT | 2 |
Does anyone have any experiences (good and bad) using Informix MaxConnect?
I'm considering using it on 3 new client machines that will each make 80+
connections to the database.
Regards
|
| 4GL 7.30 + IDS 9.40 GREAT problem | 29 Mar 2005 15:32 GMT | 2 |
4GL 7.30.UC5 fails working with NULL assigned to DATE variable.
4GL 7.30.UC2 halfs strings got via REPORT.
SPARC SOlaris 2.6
What to do?
|
| Segmentation Violation error | 29 Mar 2005 15:22 GMT | 4 |
Following is the error file created today. The database had to be
taken down by force (kill oninit processes and clear up shared memory).
First of all let me tell you that we are running in the stone age.
VERY old version on outdated platform. Our management has no intention
|
| SPL using cursor not closed or freed. | 29 Mar 2005 14:41 GMT | 1 |
See the output from onstat -g stm <sesid> below. We have recently
upgraded from 7.30 to 9.40.FC5 and using the onstat -g stm command can
see all of the users keep adding to the onstat -g stm. The app was
developed using PowerBuilder and uses stored procedures. Why don't
|
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage
Start New Thread