| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Re: troll | 30 Jul 2005 11:08 GMT | 2 |
DA Morgan said:
> Buck Nuggets wrote: >> DA Morgan wrote: |
| getting more rows out of a table | 30 Jul 2005 08:15 GMT | 3 |
I currently have a table showing data for hotels with fields such as: day_no start_date nights
|
| 4gl woe | 29 Jul 2005 21:37 GMT | 1 |
After a few red herrings, this was fixed: "yip, exactly what i said, we have renamed the interal functions "ibm_" If you include the fglsys.h in the header of the .c
|
| Trying to compile runner with 64-bit 4GL | 29 Jul 2005 19:26 GMT | 7 |
> r4gl -V IBM INFORMIX-4GL Version 7.32.FC3 Software Serial Number RDS#N000000 Solaris 9
|
| Is DBD::Informix tied to database version? | 29 Jul 2005 05:36 GMT | 1 |
Hi - I would like to upgrade our database from 9.21 HC5 to 9.40.FC4, but have Perl applications reading from the database using DBD::Informix. Does anyone know if the DBD interface is tied to the specific version
|
| stack overflow locking sysprocplan | 28 Jul 2005 16:58 GMT | 11 |
We are experiencing the following problem and have yet to resolve it completely even after an IBM support call. When users run reports in Cognos's Impromptu that use views with stored procedures calls with them, the user will lock sysprocplan and prevent other users from doing
|
| Urgent: Installation IDS10.00 FC3 on Solaris | 28 Jul 2005 16:37 GMT | 3 |
I'm not able to install IDS 10.00 on Solaris. uname -a: SunOS XXX 5.9 Generic_118558-09 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V240 I mounted the origin IBM-Informix CD. starting ./ids_install I get the only choice to install Client-SDK,
|
| T95int8 test - Perl DBD, AIX 5.3, 9.40FC3,CSDK2.90FC3 | 28 Jul 2005 16:35 GMT | 4 |
Have any of you had problems with DBD::Informix and int8's? I am getting 99.15/99.87% OK, and the failing test is t85int8.t Running table creation and insert of big numbers in dbaccess appears to be peachy.
|
| ESQL, 4GL and C/gcc on Solaris | 28 Jul 2005 05:24 GMT | 7 |
I'm trying to compile some elderly programs on a system we're migrating to IDS 10.0, 4GL 7.32 and ESQL , all FC versions, all on Solaris 9 on a 64-bit server. Solaris 9 doesn't come with a C compiler as standard, so I've installed gcc.
|
| New IDS Forum on IBM Developerworks website | 28 Jul 2005 04:25 GMT | 1 |
This forum provides a place for Informix Dynamic Server developers and users to share their questions, thoughts, and ideas with others. http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/forums/dw_forum.jsp?forum=548&cat=19
|
| Re: Stateless clients and locking schemes (or rather isolation levels) | 27 Jul 2005 20:57 GMT | 1 |
What does "Informix supports versioning columns" refer to? --- Serge Rielau <srielau@ca.ibm.com> wrote:
> Superboer wrote: |
| Re: Re: No future for DB2 | 27 Jul 2005 20:27 GMT | 5 |
Quite interesting... I haven't used Oracle for years, but if what you state is true, then it is wonderfull!. From a developer's view then the optimizer always choose the best path and I figure it that _optimizer hints_ are things of the past. Maybe an Oracle trial is in order. J.
|
| Virtual Memory problems on Informix start up | 27 Jul 2005 20:06 GMT | 2 |
I'm hoping someone can explain why this is happening. We have Informix 9.3 installed on a Sun box which has 16Gb RAM and 8 1.2GHz CPUs. We have noticed that informix is starting up strangely - before
|
| Re: MS Access 2003: Linked Tables | 27 Jul 2005 13:47 GMT | 10 |
Dear Informixers, a while ago I posted a question about a problem linking IDS 7.31UD8 tables into MS Access 2003 using the Informix ODBC driver from I-Connect 2.81TC3.
|
| Alter table | 27 Jul 2005 02:49 GMT | 3 |
Bit of a stupid question, but.... Is there a quick/easy way to determine what tables have outstanding 'alters'? Regards
|