| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Lock escalation to table level | 30 Jun 2004 10:02 GMT | 2 |
I am using Ingres II on solaris. There has been a large no of escalation to table level locking which is resulting in deadlocks and lockwaits. The error message in errlog.log shows
|
| EDBC performance | 27 Jun 2004 23:40 GMT | 2 |
I am using the EDBC JDBC driver to connect to Ingres 2.6 running on Solaris. Moving the cursor through the resultset for a simple select by calling the next() method is taking an unusually long time - 1.5 seconds per call. Does anyone have any idea what could be causing the
|
| maxlocks not being honoured on HASH tables | 26 Jun 2004 20:10 GMT | 2 |
I've noticed a problem on one of my production databases where the ING_SET maxlocks=100 symbol table entry is being ignored by some tables and indexes. With these objects, page locks escalate to table locks after the default 10 page locks have been taken. The only common factor I ...
|
| insertion of date in ingres | 26 Jun 2004 17:33 GMT | 2 |
I am having problems inserting date into ingres database throug jdbc. When I execute sql query "insert into tablename(col) values('06-12-2004') within the database it gets executed. But when I run the same query from my java program through jdbc I cannot execute
|
| DBMS crash with segmentation violation Ingres 2.6 sp2 on Tru64 5.1a | 25 Jun 2004 15:30 GMT | 5 |
Hi there!! I am experimenting esporadic and ramdom segmentation violation situation in my production environment (after migrating from II 2.0). The machine is a DS20 with 2 CPU, with RAID 5 and 3 Gb RAM. 240 ingres
|
| [Info-Ingres] test | 24 Jun 2004 08:51 GMT | 1 |
Testing list postings to info-ingres@lists.ams.org _______________________________________________ Info-ingres mailing list
|
| [Info-Ingres] "Bad page" which isn't bad | 23 Jun 2004 23:52 GMT | 1 |
(II 2.6/0305 (axp.osf/00) with patch 10059 under Tru64 Unix 5.1B pk 3) Greetings, Every since we upgraded from Ingres 2.0 to 2.6 back in Nov. 2003, every few weeks we have been getting messages in errlog.log like the following (and
|
| Empty emails arriving on Google groups | 23 Jun 2004 14:51 GMT | 1 |
I don't pretend to know how this newsgroup actually propagates mails between the various mailing list(s)/news servers. However on Google Groups there are *empty* emails coming in. e.g. All empty:
|
| [Info-Ingres] rollforwarddb | 23 Jun 2004 12:31 GMT | 3 |
Can anyone tell me if a 2.6 installation can rollfoward a database from a 2.0 checkpoint? Gareth Williams English:- This message is confidential. If you are not the intended
|
| [Info-Ingres] test #2 | 23 Jun 2004 08:58 GMT | 1 |
Well it looks like the mailing list has unsubscribed me or something. My post turned up in comp.databases.ingres and I got a couple of out of office replies, though not my own message - which tells me that the newsgroup, mailing list and gateway are all working ok.
|
| [Info-Ingres] Incle, Adding Constraints and Fatal Code! | 22 Jun 2004 14:34 GMT | 1 |
Hi Dudes, Incle: We have an Oracle programmer who has been allowed to make Ingres Table structures. I'm describing the resultant chaos as a new language 'Incle'.
|
| ODBC to ingres fails | 22 Jun 2004 14:00 GMT | 1 |
I am having trouble linking tables in ingres ii 2.0 to access 2000 via odbc. The connection works in vdba/netutil/dsn but when I try to link a table in access I get one of two errors. Intermittently it does work when I create the link, but after that it
|
| [Info-Ingres] Disaster Recovery Plan | 18 Jun 2004 01:43 GMT | 2 |
Hi gang, It's getting close to that time of year when we test our DR plan and I'm not happy with our current procedure. We've always managed to recover the database but ended up with a lot of errors when verifydb is run. To
|
| A Server Class Question. | 17 Jun 2004 10:33 GMT | 5 |
Having discovered something very interesting at the end of last week (If you start up a DBMS server on the test installation with NAME_SERVER set to OFF it creates a system logical defining II_DBMS_SERVER which prevents anyone connecting to any databases in
|
| Ingres - Solaris or AIX? | 15 Jun 2004 09:58 GMT | 3 |
The powers to be at the place I work are seriously looking to change hardware vendors from Sun to IBM. This means that we will have to migrate our large Ingres database/ABF application from Solaris 8 to AIX 5.2.
|