| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| extracting records using a cursor within a cursor | 26 May 2005 11:15 GMT | 20 |
I am using Oracle 9i I need to extract records from a table where certain criteria is met and then compare 4 fields from those records to 4 fields in another table. Where the records don't match I need them extracted into
|
| Access MS SQL Server tables from Oracle 9i | 26 May 2005 08:11 GMT | 11 |
I need to access MS SQL Server tables (SQL Server 2000 on Windows 2000) from applications running on Oracle 9i on a Solaris 8 (Sparc) server. I think I am in the same situation as the person in <e70fc892.0209031332.6045a661@posting.google.com> (which is from 2002).
|
| Finding table modification timings(not just the last one) | 26 May 2005 08:03 GMT | 3 |
Is there a way to find out whether a Table was modified in certain period(E.g.Between 16-Apr-2005,10 am and 17-Apr-2005,9 am)? We could see that there are records added/modified in a Table. But, we would like to confirm whether there was any change in the Table in a certain
|
| Oracle JDBC driver's limitations | 26 May 2005 07:53 GMT | 1 |
I read the book and manual on oracle's jdbc driver, and it SEEMS to suggest that oracle's driver has some extra limitations. However, the description is not clear enough so I just want to double check here. I am using Oracle 9i R2.
|
| Technology Writer Looking for Network Professionals who Blog to Interview | 26 May 2005 06:38 GMT | 1 |
I am a freelance writer for a computer magazine, and my current assignment is to interview "network professionals" who write interesting blogs. (I'm perfectly willing to reveal the name of the magazine once I've made contact with a good subject. I'm sure all
|
| Can RedHat ASE 2.1 primary Oracle DB have SUSE physical standby? | 26 May 2005 00:26 GMT | 6 |
We are trying to migrate or DB from RH 2.1 to SUSE 9, need to do it with no downtime (we have a standby). Can we re-create standby on SUSE platform and switch to it (e.g. will the redo logs generated by RedHat ASE 2.1
|
| What should be a simple date problem... | 25 May 2005 21:49 GMT | 1 |
I have what should be a fairly simple date problem, but I am just not having any luck getting it to work... I have a table with a column of DATE type. This column is called CLSDDATE, and all values in there are GMT based.
|
| sql question | 25 May 2005 21:10 GMT | 5 |
Let's say I have the fallowing table: tbl 1 col1 col2 col3 val 1 2 s 45
|
| awk & escape character | 25 May 2005 19:52 GMT | 3 |
how do i define an escape character in awk. i am using awk at the unix command line. cat a.list |awk 'BEGIN {} {a=a"'"$1"',"} END{print a }' ^
|
| Question: Normal index structure/size under 9i | 25 May 2005 19:48 GMT | 5 |
Basic architectural question here: I have a normal index against 4 columns of a 18.8M row table. The types of the 4 indexed columns are 3x NUMBER(10) and a DATE. By my math, with a DATE being max 7 bytes, this adds up to 37 bytes of
|
| Avoiding table or index access at all | 25 May 2005 19:21 GMT | 3 |
I want to set a condition in the where clause of the select statement which eliminates any table (or index) access or atleast minimizes the time needed to execute statement. To be more specific:
|
| Solaris 9 and Orcale Performance Question | 25 May 2005 16:46 GMT | 2 |
I have 2 Sparc e250 boxes running Oracle 8.1.7.4. Both Oracle installations are identical and each box has 1GB RAM and an identical setup. One box is running Solaris 7 and the other Solaris 9. When running
|
| ORA-04031: unable to allocate 8388608 bytes of shared memory | 25 May 2005 16:25 GMT | 2 |
I have a query returning the following error message: ORA-04031: unable to allocate 8388608 bytes of shared memory ("shared pool","unknown object","hash-join subh","QERHJ Hash Table Entries") What I really would like to know, is if an attempt to allocate "8388608
|
| Weird bug with Oracle's shared pool management? | 25 May 2005 16:22 GMT | 2 |
This is a phenomenal bug in Oracle 9i: SQL> select version from v$instance; VERSION -----------------
|
| Rollback Segment Question | 25 May 2005 16:06 GMT | 2 |
Hi We use Oracle 8.1.7.4 on Solaris 8 Sparc When the database is under heavy load i.e. 10s of thousands of record are being inserted I get a lot of 'undo header contention'.
|