| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Limiting Connections | 01 Jul 2005 00:30 GMT | 4 |
Can anyone tell me what's the best way of limiting connections to a database (9.2.0.4)? We've just gone live with a system that allows students to view their exam results via the web (9.0.4.1 apps server). However, these projects
|
| script or program to deploy plsql code while securing DB passwords | 30 Jun 2005 22:11 GMT | 6 |
Say we had Unix users (developers really) that needed to deploy plsql code to an Oracle DB on a remote HP-UX box. But these users would not have any security to that remote box or database. Say we did not want to surrender users or passwords of the remote box or Database.
|
| Failed installation of 10g on White Box Linux 3.0 x86 | 30 Jun 2005 21:29 GMT | 5 |
I'm trying to install Oracle 10g 10.1.0.3 (for Linux x86) on White Box Linux Release 3.0 Respin 1. The runInstaller failed with the following message : Checking operating system version: must be redhat-2.1,redhat-3,SuSE-9,SuSE-8
|
| Async IO on Oracle 9.2.0.5 | 30 Jun 2005 21:00 GMT | 2 |
We are trying to figure if oracle is indeed using async io there are two articles/notes i referred to in the process and of course the metalink. We did relink the Oracle kernel 1. http://download-east.oracle.com/oowsf2004/1449_wp.pdf See page 14
|
| Unable to declare a cursor | 30 Jun 2005 20:06 GMT | 3 |
Hi, I'm getting a "PLS-00402: alias required in SELECT list of cursor to avoid duplicate column names" error when every single one of the field in the SELECT clause have been aliased. CURSOR
|
| Does Partition DDL generate redologs? | 30 Jun 2005 19:28 GMT | 8 |
Here is the scenario. We have a production instance with huge partitioned tables (almost 2 billion rows in the biggest table ) partitioned on a weekly basis. We are embarking on an archiving mechanism where we are trying to
|
| Oracle 10g client problem | 30 Jun 2005 19:03 GMT | 1 |
I had problems with Oracle 10g Client. I un-installed the 9i client first. Now all the client operations like ODBC and others that uses TNS cannot resolve names. Although Enterprise Manager works fine and will look in the network/admin directory of the 10G client.
|
| 10.1.0.4 SUSE9 SP1 ASM | 30 Jun 2005 17:12 GMT | 2 |
Martin Solveig wrote:
> Hello, > SLES9 SP1 is on PIII with two 800MHz procesors and 2GB RAM, > on four SATA 156GBhard disks are created two RAID1 arays, |
| moving lob to different tablespace | 30 Jun 2005 16:20 GMT | 1 |
Oracle 10G on Linux: I have a large table TA1 sitting on tablespace TS1. On this table I have a column CO1 of type CLOB. As I have a second tablespace TS2 and I want to balance space usage a
|
| Dedicated server 2 | 30 Jun 2005 15:36 GMT | 1 |
Hi (again) I had a problem with a standalone Oracle forms 6i app at our branches. Accessing the db from the lan is no problem, but accessing from the wan gives ORA-12545. I finally got around it by specifying (server=dedicated) in
|
| Oracle Inventory | 30 Jun 2005 15:32 GMT | 6 |
I need your advice so please could you tell me what is the way to collect information about the oracle versions and options installed or used on database server. This information should be collected remotely without accessing or logging
|
| Variable value is gone | 30 Jun 2005 15:24 GMT | 2 |
I want to send following message body by using UTL_SMTP. The variable msg_body is of type clob. cCRLF constant varchar2(10) := utl_tcp.CRLF; msg_body1 clob;
|
| Oracle 9i for x86-32 vs x86-64 | 30 Jun 2005 15:20 GMT | 2 |
I need to upgrade an oracle server. For a new server, I picked dual Xeon Intel board and 2G of memory (a lot of people would say "too low", but the person who manages db says that it would be enough for 2-3 years. Now the question is - board and CPUs support EM64T, should I pick up
|
| Oracle 9i for x86-32 vs x86-64 | 30 Jun 2005 15:13 GMT | 1 |
I need to upgrade an oracle server. For a new server, I picked dual Xeon Intel board and 2G of memory (a lot of people would say "too low", but the person who manages db says that it would be enough for 2-3 years. Now the question is - board and CPUs support EM64T, should I pick up
|
| Dedicated server | 30 Jun 2005 15:01 GMT | 1 |
I have an app server with 2 tnsnames connections to my Oracle 8.1.7 db, one set up for dedicated server (server=dedicated) and the other not. Running a particular query using the dedicated server conn gives ORA-03232 but the same query, same user, using the 'non dedicated' conn is ...
|