| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Bug in CREATE VIEW grammar | 01 Oct 2004 00:59 GMT | 2 |
While having trouble extending the CREATE VIEW grammar i discovered this: bommel@[local]:yomama #= CREATE VIEW vtest as SELECT * from abteilung WITH; CREATE VIEW I can reproduce this on 8.0.0beta1 && beta3 and in a 7.4.2 production
|
| Accessing an array element from a function | 30 Sep 2004 23:59 GMT | 1 |
This may be mostly a documention issue: I have a function with two parameters that returns an array: text[]. I want to access just the first element of that array within my SQL statement.
|
| output branches before infinite recursion using connectby()? | 30 Sep 2004 23:56 GMT | 1 |
is it possible to output the branches before the detection of infinite recursion when using connectby()? My work is about software evolution analysis. One of the questions i am interested in is class usage. For example, class A uses B, B uses C, C uses D, and finally D uses A. I ...
|
| Index locking considerations | 30 Sep 2004 23:14 GMT | 1 |
I've been thinking more about Gaetano Mendola's report of a FlushRelationBuffers failure during VACUUM FULL. I still don't see how that could happen in 7.4, but I do see a real related risk in 8.0. The problem is that in many situations we assume that a lock on an
|
| pg_upgrade project: high-level design proposal of in-place upgrade facility | 30 Sep 2004 22:42 GMT | 2 |
Hello dear all, [Please CC your replies to me as I am on the digest mode] Here's finally a very high-level design proposal of the pg_upgrade feature I was handwaiving a couple of weeks ago. Since, I am almost done with the
|
| Bug in Beta3 with parser? | 30 Sep 2004 22:30 GMT | 3 |
Consider: template1=# create table baz (test numeric); CREATE TABLE template1=# insert into baz values (5);
|
| regression failure on Solaris contrib/cube | 30 Sep 2004 22:14 GMT | 1 |
First error know to be caught by the buildfarm - this is one of DarcyB's test client machines. All the details below were pulled from the buildfarm test server's database. This report is from HEAD, but it might also apply to earlier branches.
|
| Undefined symbols: _poll | 30 Sep 2004 22:07 GMT | 2 |
I'm just moved my Postgres client project from Mac 10.2.8 to 10.3.5. It's an Objective-C program that links to libpq.a (the header file is libpq-fe.h). However, when I try to compile now I get the following linking error:
|
| postgres start problems with memory | 30 Sep 2004 21:50 GMT | 3 |
I keep getting this error. DETAIL: Failed system call was shmget(key=5432001, size=34037760, 03600). HINT: This error usually means that PostgreSQL's request for a shared memory segment exceeded your kernel's SHMMAX parameter. You can
|
| COPY FROM STDIN not in local file | 30 Sep 2004 21:44 GMT | 2 |
Is there a way to do COPY FROM STDIN from sql? So, remotely I could run the copy command and somehow push the info over instead of having it on the server. -Josh
|
| index for or relation | 30 Sep 2004 21:19 GMT | 1 |
Maybe that a basic question ,sorry. I have to 2 tables : Column | Type | Modifiers ----------------+-----------------------------+-----------
|
| SIGABRT on 7.4.5 | 30 Sep 2004 20:03 GMT | 1 |
I have been trying to troubleshoot a PL/R related issue on-and-off for a few weeks now, but this morning ran into what appears to be a more general issue related to 7.4.5 on x86_64. A full backtrace is below, and in it you can see that PL/R is never reached (but PL/pgSQL is). ...
|
| FlushRelationBuffers error | 30 Sep 2004 19:29 GMT | 4 |
I'm running postgres 7.4.5 on a linux box, this morning I got this error on my logs: WARNING: FlushRelationBuffers("exp_provider", 1836): block 1460 is referenced (private 0, global 1) ERROR: FlushRelationBuffers returned -2 DEBUG: AbortCurrentTransaction
|
| how to encode/encrypt a string | 30 Sep 2004 18:56 GMT | 2 |
still doing my switch from MySQL to PgSQL, and can't figure out what the comparable function would be for this: In MySQL, to store a big secret (like a credit card number) in the database that I didn't want anyone to be able to see without knowing
|
| Data Partition is Growing | 30 Sep 2004 17:43 GMT | 3 |
I'm an application developer trying to understand a pg data partition issue. We are storing large objects (gifs) at a rate of about 1GIG /day. After about a week, most of the objects are recycled -- that is, an insert triggers a delete of a similar object. The postgres data
|